Life story

1958 space. My birth

1965 lost in space. Gemini

1969 Armstrong on moon

1971 Grand Canyon

1974 house fire

1976 senior year

1980 marriage

1984 Joshua

1986 fertility

1993 exit GSU

1995 new signals

1999 lost in myself

2000 lost in Jesus

2002 Joshua

2015 end of new signals

2019 back to consulting

2020 elektrafi

2022 back to L&W

2023 evergreen

The Hound of Heaven (Retold: John’s Story)
inspired by Francis Thompson

I fled Him—
Not with wild rebellion,
but with a mask, a schedule,
a smile I wore to church.
I buried myself in roles,
in performance,
in the lie:
I am not enough.

He followed.

Through my wife’s quiet loyalty,
through the voice that said,
“This is not who you are.”
Through Leisa’s love—stubborn, undeserved—
He kept whispering,
even when I had stopped listening.

I fled Him—
into ambition, distraction,
self-justification.
Into the ache of not being seen,
not even by myself.
I believed the lie was my truth.
That unworthiness was my name.

But still—
He followed.

With unhurried pace,
with measured mercy,
with deliberate grace.

He did not break the door.
He knocked.

And when I lost my way,
He left signs:
A friend’s invitation.
A weekend I didn’t want.
A table with a name—
The Living Word.
He was already speaking
before I could understand the words.

I fled Him—
into rage and grief,
into the night my son died.
Into the scream that emptied my soul
in the dark of our driveway.

And still—
He was there.

I didn’t feel Him.
Didn’t want Him.
But He was already holding me
when I had nothing left to hold.

Twelve fifty AM.
A detail on a death certificate.
The same moment I looked at my phone.
I thought it was coincidence.
But it was grace—
etched in eternal ink.

I fled Him,
but I never outran Him.
Because prevenient grace does not chase to conquer—
it chases to claim.

And even as I sat in silence,
too wounded to respond,
He stayed.

Even as I forgot His face,
He remembered mine.

Even as I questioned His love,
He was writing my calling.

Even as I buried my son,
He was planting seeds of purpose.

And now—
I do not run.

Now I walk.
Sometimes I limp.
But I walk with the One
who never stopped walking with me.

A Life of Purpose

Faith, Engineering, and Quiet Service

John Edwin Hargrove

Born January 24, 1958
Kirbyville, Texas

Dedication

To Leisa,
my partner in all things,

To Joshua,
whose brief life illuminated what matters most,

To the legacy bearers who come after,
carrying forward what was given to us.

Table of Contents

Foreword

PART ONE: ROOTS AND INHERITANCE

  •   The Forty-Third Generation: An Epic of Inheritance
  •   Ancestry and Heritage

PART TWO: FORMATION YEARS (1958–1976)

  •   Chapter 1: Roots in Buna — Family, Faith, and the Land
  •   Chapter 2: Troop 44 — The Shaping Years

PART THREE: BUILDING YEARS (1976–2002)

  •   Chapter 3: College, Marriage, and the Engineering Path
  •   Chapter 4: Professional Life and Community Roots

PART FOUR: THE TURNING POINT (2000–2005)

  •   Chapter 5: Spiritual Awakening and the Loss of Joshua
  •   Chapter 6: Treasured Memories from 2001

PART FIVE: MATURE SERVICE (2006–2025)

  •   Chapter 7: Influencers in Life — The People Who Shaped Us
  •   Chapter 8: A Life of Quiet Leadership
  •   Chapter 9: Reflections at Sixty-Seven

PART SIX: ONGOING JOURNEY

  •   A Prayer Journey: Seven Movements Toward Wholeness

Appendices

  •   Timeline of John Edwin Hargrove (1958–2025)
  •   Complete Ancestral Framework

Foreword

This is not a biography written by an outsider. This is a life story written from within—the accumulated reflections, memories, and documents of a man who has lived through six decades of purpose, struggle, faith, and service.

John Edwin Hargrove was born in a small East Texas town to parents who modeled integrity, creativity, and responsibility. He grew up carrying both the weight and the gift of a twelve-century legacy of which he was largely unaware. He would become an engineer, an entrepreneur, a father, a widower, a community leader, and a servant of both God and neighbor.

This book gathers the written work of recent years—journals, memoir pieces, ancestral narratives, and reflections on a life still unfolding. It is organized chronologically, thematically, and spiritually to tell a complete story: where John came from, who shaped him, what he has built, what he has lost, and what he has learned.

It is the story of ordinary faithfulness—the kind that builds communities, sustains families, and endures through loss without losing its capacity to hope.

It is also the story of a man who still feels, at sixty-seven, like he’s just beginning.

May you find in these pages something that speaks to your own journey.

PART ONE: ROOTS AND INHERITANCE

Every life is shaped by forces that precede it. Family heritage, ancestral courage, inherited values—these things move through us like water through limestone, invisible but shaping everything.

For John Hargrove, that inheritance is remarkably deep. It stretches back twelve centuries, from Welsh kings to French refugees to Carolina settlers to Texas pioneers. It is the story of people who chose faith over comfort, service over self-preservation, and community over isolation.

To understand John, we must first understand where he came from.

The Forty-Third Generation: An Epic of Inheritance

This is the story of a twelve-century inheritance. It begins in the misty mountains of Wales, passes through the persecution of French Huguenots, spreads across colonial Carolina, and ultimately reaches East Texas—where a man named John Hargrove carries forward what his ancestors fought to preserve.

From Merfyn the Freckled to Modern Day

In the year 825, a Welsh prince with freckled skin and iron determination consolidated his kingdom against Norse raiders and Mercian armies. His name was Merfyn Frych. He refused to surrender. He held the line. This is the first inheritance: the refusal to abandon what matters, no matter the cost.

Eight centuries later, his descendants faced a different kind of siege. When King Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, French Protestants called Huguenots faced an impossible choice: abandon faith or abandon homeland. The Richbourg family chose faith. They joined 200,000 refugees fleeing to the New World.

This is the second inheritance: the willingness to sacrifice comfort for conviction.

The Carolina lowcountry was not kind to its new arrivals. Swamps and fever, brutal summers, uncertain harvests. But they persevered. They were merchants and artisans, craftsmen and farmers. They built. This is the third inheritance: the capacity to build from nothing.

The Richbourgs never stopped moving. From Carolina to Georgia to Alabama to Mississippi to Texas. Each generation carried forward the same qualities: faith, determination, service, and the stubborn refusal to abandon responsibility.

Now comes John Hargrove. The forty-third generation of a line that began before the Norman Conquest. He carries the same blood that flowed through Merfyn the Freckled, mixed with a thousand tributaries but still carrying the same essential qualities. The same determination that enabled a Welsh prince to hold his kingdom now drives an engineer in East Texas to work when he should rest. The same faith that carried Huguenots across an ocean now makes it impossible for him to set down responsibilities that perhaps he should let others carry.

The inheritance is there. It moves through him like water through limestone—invisible, shaping, persistent.

But inheritance is both gift and weight. The strengths that saved his ancestors can become the very things that threaten him. Resilience can harden into inability to yield. Service can curdle into inability to receive. Faith can transform into weight that no single pair of shoulders should be asked to bear.

This is John’s journey: to understand what he has inherited, honor it, and learn to carry it differently—with grace, with help, with the wisdom that some burdens were never meant to be borne alone.

The Web of Names: A Brief Ancestral Framework

Your family tree spans approximately 1,465 individuals and reaches deep into early American colonial families. It includes:

English Ancestry from Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia—families like Pace, Smithwick, Wright, Richardson, and Pearce. These are the colonial settlers and frontier pioneers who established the American South.

French Huguenot heritage through the Richbourg/Richebourg line—Protestant refugees who fled persecution and built communities in the Carolinas, then pushed westward.

Scots-Irish and Scottish pioneers who brought frontier independence and community values to the rural South.

Medieval British connections through several documented gentry lines—York, Plantagenet, Tudor, Howard—appearing through early Virginia families.

Welsh, Irish, and other Western European lines, adding texture and resilience to the overall inheritance.

This is not a heritage of wealth or titles. It is a heritage of faithfulness, courage, hard work, and the determination to build something that lasts. From the mountains of Gwynedd to the piney woods of East Texas, across twelve centuries and an ocean, through persecution and migration and war and peace, the line endures.

It endures because each generation chose to honor what was given to them by transforming it for those who followed.

That is the true inheritance. That is the story John carries.

PART TWO: FORMATION YEARS (1958–1976)

Chapter 1: Roots in Buna — Family, Faith, and the Land

I was born on a cold Friday morning, January 24, 1958, in Kirbyville, Texas, but my life’s soil was in Buna, a place that—once it has claimed you—never truly lets you go. The pines here grow tall and straight, the summers hum with cicadas, and the air smells faintly of pine resin, red dirt, and whatever your neighbor is cooking for supper. It was here, in this small town tucked into the corner of East Texas, that my roots sank deep.

My father, Robert Edwin Hargrove, was a man who carried his Korean War service in quiet dignity. He was as comfortable with a wrench as he was with a fishing rod, able to coax life back into broken machinery or find the perfect spot on the Neches River for catfish. He taught me that work wasn’t just about making a living—it was about doing it right, whether anyone noticed or not.

My mother, Lavee Richbourg Hargrove, was a blend of creativity, grit, and gentle stubbornness. She could sew clothes that fit better than anything from a store, make a meal stretch farther than seemed possible, and still have the energy to craft something beautiful. Her hands were never idle, and neither was her faith.

We lived on forty-four acres just south of town, with a yard full of chickens, the occasional stubborn dog, and the kind of peace you only find when the nearest neighbor is a good walk away. The house was modest, but the table was never empty, and my parents worked side-by-side to make sure of it.

The Grandparents’ Influence

On my mother’s side, Mozell Bellomy Richbourg was a steady presence—a woman of kindness who had a habit of serving “coffee milk” to the grandchildren, a sweet mix that made us feel grown. My grandfather, George Truman Richbourg, was a dreamer and a draftsman, and I can still remember the smell of pencil shavings and paper in his workroom. He taught me the art of drawing plans, the patience of careful lines, and the belief that ideas could become real things.

On my father’s side, Melvina Denman Hargrove was tall, constant, and caring. My grandfather, James Gaius Hargrove, was a character—always with a nickel in one pocket and a pinch of tobacco in the other, with a fondness for jalapeño peppers that seemed to defy nature. From them, I learned the value of constancy, humor, and holding your own in a conversation.

Uncles and aunts formed a kind of extended safety net—each unique, each memorable. Uncle Tommy Richbourg, Uncle James Weldon Hargrove—who could have walked straight out of a John Wayne film—Uncle George Hardy Hargrove, who knew how to have fun, and Uncle Bill and Aunt Doris Kirkpatrick, whose combination of hard work and kindness taught me what family meant outside the walls of your own home.

School Days in Buna

Buna schools were small enough that you knew the names of every kid in your grade, and the teachers had a way of becoming permanent fixtures in your life. From Mrs. Iris Pope in first grade to the string of dedicated educators in high school—Coach Wade Reese, Larry Hatch, Billie Jean Clark, Steve Hyden, Harold Simmons, Bob Garner, and Anthony Michalski—each teacher added something to the foundation being laid.

These were people who expected excellence. They did not coddle or lower standards. But they also believed their students could meet those standards. That belief itself was a gift.

Chapter 2: Troop 44 — The Shaping Years

Scouting was the crucible where my character was forged. Under the guidance of Father Vincent, Billy Rowles, and Johnny Marble, I pushed myself beyond what I thought I could do. At thirteen, I earned my Eagle Scout rank—completing fifty-one merit badges and the mile swim. That mile in the water was as much a test of grit as any academic challenge, and I learned that leadership often looks like steady persistence rather than grand gestures.

The Service Project

For my Eagle service project, I chose the old Bessmay Cemetery. A gentleman whose name I cannot recall had family buried there (probably Bill Jones). The cemetery had fallen into disarray from decades of neglect—headstones tilted, brush overgrown, the dead forgotten. He organized everything: transportation, food, drink, tools. There were four of us. We cleared and cleaned and straightened what we could. Service to those who could not repay us.

By every measure that mattered to the world, I had succeeded. Eagle Scout at fourteen. Presidential recognition. Family pride. Community respect.

And underneath, something else.

The body was changing. Puberty arrived—unbidden, unwelcome, undeniable. Things stirred that I had no language for, no framework to understand. I felt guilty. I felt hollow. Dark thoughts came—not thoughts I chose, but thoughts that arrived and would not leave.

A sense of unworthiness.

The boy being applauded at church was not the boy I knew myself to be. If they knew what I carried, they would not applaud. So I learned to wear the mask—the good Methodist scouting mask. I smiled. I achieved. I showed up. And I told no one.

A lie had taken root: that I was not what I appeared to be, that something was fundamentally wrong with me, that the gap between the public self and the private self was proof of my corruption. I would carry that lie for twenty-nine more years before something finally broke it open.

Friends and Foundations

My earliest friends were more like brothers: Elray Brown in second grade—a genuinely good guy. Dale Miller from junior high onward, with horses and cool tech gadgets. Casey Walker, calm and strong, from high school onward. Tim Hudson, my church and college companion—determined and solid. Terry Yeates, from elementary school and church—a true friend through every season.

These early years were a mosaic of family, school, and scouting, stitched together by the rhythms of small-town Texas life—Friday night football, church on Sundays, the hum of summer insects, and the occasional sound of my father’s tools in the shop. I didn’t know it then, but every moment was preparing me for a life of building.

PART THREE: BUILDING YEARS (1976–2002)

Chapter 3: College, Marriage, and the Engineering Path

I began pre-engineering studies at Lamar University in 1976, struggling initially with calculus but eventually mastering it through persistence. My early work included student engineering roles and cooperative internships in telecommunications. In 1978, I began a student engineering position at Gulf States Utilities (GSU), beginning what would become a fifteen-year career with the company.

In 1975, during my senior year of high school, I met Leisa. We spoke for the first time at a graduation ceremony. Over the next several months, something quietly grew between us. We began dating in November of that year and became engaged in 1977.

On March 7, 1980, while both still in college, we married. It was a decision of sheer brilliance on my part. We were poor, we were in school, we faced financial strain during the final college year—but we chose each other. That partnership has sustained everything that followed.

In 1981, I graduated from Lamar University with my Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE). In 1983, Leisa and I began attempting to start a family. In April 1984, our son Joshua Blake Hargrove was born—via C-section, a bright and compassionate young man whose life, though short, would touch many.

In the mid-1980s, I was licensed as a Professional Engineer in Texas. My work at GSU included telecommunications, SCADA, microwave systems, and protective relaying across more than 30 locations across a multi-state network. It was formative, high-pressure, and rewarding—an environment that shaped how I see systems, risk, and people.

Chapter 4: Professional Life and Community Roots

In 1993, I left GSU as the utility prepared for the Entergy merger. I joined Lockard & White in Houston for two years, managing major infrastructure projects. One of the most memorable was a 100-hop analog-to-digital microwave upgrade for Transcontinental Gas Pipeline.

That experience reignited my entrepreneurial spirit. I wanted to serve clients directly and build something of my own.

In 1995, I founded New Signals Engineering Corporation. The early days were lean and intense—every project mattered, and I wore every hat. But the work was good, and God opened doors. In 1996, my former boss at GSU, Bob Pohl, hired my firm to design and implement a 100 Mbps fiber ring for the City of College Station. That project not only cemented my credibility—it changed the trajectory of my life.

From 1997 through 2014, I ran New Signals full time, serving electric cooperatives, municipalities, pipeline operators, and Fortune 500 clients. My work extended to public safety radio systems, oil and gas SCADA, offshore communications in Africa, and early cybersecurity practices. Whether it was a remote fire tower in the Big Thicket or an urban fiber buildout, I showed up with one aim: to serve well and solve the right problem.

We lived a good life. We had financial success. But something was missing—a deeper sense of purpose. I was building systems, but I was not building community. I was making money, but I was not making meaning.

I was successful by every worldly measure. And I was spiritually adrift.

PART FOUR: THE TURNING POINT (2000–2005)

Chapter 5: Spiritual Awakening and the Loss of Joshua

In October 2000, at the age of 42, something shifted. I attended Walk to Emmaus #51 in Orange, Texas. It was a three-day spiritual retreat designed to deepen faith, build community, and encounter Christ in a new way. I sat at the Table of the Living Word. And in those three days, something broke open inside me.

I experienced the realization that Jesus loves me—not abstractly, not theologically, but personally and completely. This I know. It was a moment when I truly knew it for the first time, and realized I had been living in ignorance before. That moment alone saved me from what was to come in less than two years.

Late in 2000, I began disciplined Bible study and prayer. Leisa and I increased our church involvement. In 2001, I became a Certified Lay Speaker in the United Methodist Church. That same year, we began serving as Youth Directors at Buna FUMC, hosting home Bible studies for young people. I worked the Beaumont District Summer Camp, helping lead a high school group.

I was being built new. The faith I had inherited from my mother was being activated in me. The twelve-century legacy of faith was becoming personal, alive, immediate.

And then, in June 2002, Joshua died.

He was eighteen years old. A car accident on a June morning changed everything in an instant. The boy who had been born in 1984 during a moment of joy was gone. The future I had imagined—watching him graduate, go to college, build a life—simply ceased to exist.

Grief is not something you recover from. It is something you learn to carry. Missing him is not a weakness—it is a testament that what you shared was real and sacred and irreplaceable.

For two years after his death, Leisa and I served as Youth Directors. We continued hosting Bible studies. We were present for teenagers going through their own struggles, their own questions, their own dark nights. And through that service, we found a way to honor Joshua’s memory by pouring into the young people he had known and loved.

In December 2005, I was licensed as a Minister of the Gospel with the World Ministry Fellowship—a non-denominational ordination that reflected my move toward deeper spiritual engagement and away from the strict structures of institutional religion.

The loss of Joshua broke me open. And in that brokenness, God did something unexpected: He transformed my grief into a capacity to serve others in theirs.

Chapter 6: Treasured Memories from 2001

Weeks after 9/11, as our nation reeled and grieved, a father and his sons found moments of light. Two movie nights in late 2001 still stand out like mile-markers on the long road of memory.

November 30, 2001: Behind Enemy Lines

After a meal at Black Eyed Pea in Beaumont, we sat together at Tinseltown and watched Behind Enemy Lines. The film’s heart was simple and strong: courage under fire, loyalty that doesn’t break, and the determination to come home. It was a story of rescue, grit, and holding onto hope when it seems impossible. In those months after the towers fell, those themes echoed what many people were feeling—fear, resilience, and the search for redemption.

The film followed Lt. Chris Burnett, a Navy flight officer shot down over hostile territory. As he raced across snow-covered mountains and war-torn villages, Admiral Leslie Reigart defied orders to launch an unsanctioned rescue mission. The film emphasized that loyalty, sacrifice, and the value of a single human life were worth risking everything.

December 1, 2001: Spy Game

The next night, Joshua and I returned to Tinseltown for Spy Game. We ate at Taste of China, Joshua’s favorite place. The movie carried a different tone: sacrifice, mentorship, hidden battles, and the cost of loyalty in a complicated world.

Nathan Muir, a veteran CIA operative on the edge of retirement, learns that his protégé, Tom Bishop, has been arrested in China during an unauthorized mission to rescue a woman he loves. While the CIA prepares to let Bishop die quietly, Muir fights a covert battle to secretly fund and orchestrate a rescue operation.

Through layered flashbacks—Vietnam, Cold War Berlin, Beirut—the film reveals how Muir shaped Bishop, trained him, and how their relationship evolved from teacher-student to something like father and son. Both men ultimately choose love and loyalty over institutional protection.

Why These Memories Matter

The films were action, noise, and fast-moving plots. But what stayed with me wasn’t the thrill. It was the time. A father with his son. Laughter. Popcorn. Easy conversations on the drive home. A sense of normalcy returning after national trauma.

Years later, I would understand that both films spoke directly to patterns in my own life: sacrifice for those you love, choosing people over systems, and the long, hard road toward redemption. They also spoke to what matters most—not institutions or power or comfort, but the bonds we forge with people, the willingness to rescue and protect, and the grace that meets us when we’re willing to carry weight for someone else.

I treasure these memories with Joshua and Eli. They remind me that the Lord meets us not only in prayer and worship, but also in shared meals, movie nights, and the simple joy of being together. Even in uncertain times, Jesus holds us steady and invites us to cherish the people entrusted to us.

Now, more than twenty years later, when I watch those films again each year, I am visiting the shape of who we were together. I am touching memory gently, honoring a son who mattered deeply, and being reminded that love never truly dies—it simply transforms into a different kind of presence, a different kind of prayer.

PART FIVE: MATURE SERVICE (2006–2025)

Chapter 7: Influencers in Life — The People Who Shaped Us

Every life is shaped by forces and people who come before us. For John Hargrove, the list is long and distinctive—parents and grandparents, teachers and mentors, friends and family who contributed to who he would become.

His mother Lavee Richbourg Hargrove was a woman of tireless energy and boundless creativity. Whether she was sewing, upholstering furniture for neighbors, painting cypress knees into whimsical Santa figures, or organizing community events, she demonstrated that work could be both purposeful and beautiful.

His father Robert Edwin Hargrove complemented her creative energy with practical intelligence. He understood science as the working principles behind the physical world—how engines ran, how crops grew, how machines could be repaired and made useful again. Together, they created a home where children grew up knowing the value of honest work, the satisfaction of creating with one’s hands, and the importance of both imagination and practical skill.

In scouting, Father Vincent set clear expectations and expected the boys to meet them. Billy Rowles and Johnny Marble provided practical leadership and patient instruction. They taught John what it meant to lead with quiet confidence rather than loud command.

In high school, teachers like Larry Hatch, who wove narratives that made abstract concepts concrete and helped John understand the relationship between science and faith. Coach Wade Reese embodied excellence—calm, determined, and completely devoted to bringing out the best in his students. Anthony Michalski brought excellence in music and the discipline that ensemble performance requires.

Later, there was Leisa—the love of his life, the constant presence that made all other achievements possible. And Joshua, whose brief life illuminated what matters most, whose death transformed grief into compassion, and whose memory continues to shape priorities and perspectives.

This is the deepest lesson: we are not self-made but community-made. The best response to such a gift is not pride in personal achievement but gratitude for all the hands that shaped us—and a commitment to becoming, in our turn, worthy influences on those who come after.

Chapter 8: A Life of Quiet Leadership

In 2006, I became a Certified Faith-Based Counselor through the International Institute of Faith-Based Counseling in Beaumont. From 2006 through 2014, I continued New Signals Engineering while deepening my commitment to faith-based service and community leadership.

In 2015, I joined Sam Houston Electric Cooperative as Engineer II. My largest project there was leading the design and deployment of a 72,000-meter Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system. The system required RF planning, cyber segmentation, and deep coordination across IT, SCADA, and operational leadership. I also re-architected the cooperative’s WAN into a Layer 3 structure, introducing OSPF and BGP protocols to support network resilience.

In 2019, I stepped into the role of Chief Technology Officer at East Texas Electric Cooperative, providing strategic guidance for ten member co-ops and their G&T provider.

But in 2020, something unexpected happened. During the COVID-19 pandemic, rural families in Buna had no access to reliable broadband. Schools were closed. Remote work was impossible. Families needed connectivity, and no one was providing it.

I was approached by former clients who asked me to build a wireless internet service provider from scratch. I said yes.

For the next two years, I worked over 3,900 hours of overtime—designing backhaul, erecting towers, integrating routers, and building a support and billing system from the ground up. By 2022, we had 725 customers and were generating $55,000 a month in revenue. More than that, we were changing lives. Kids could attend school online. Families could work from home. Businesses could stay open.

We turned crisis into connectivity.

In 2023, I returned to Lockard & White as a Senior Telecommunications Engineer and became Chief Operating Officer at Evergreen Technology Solutions. At Evergreen, I lead our broadband buildout across Jasper and Newton counties, including VOIP integration, public safety radio, library infrastructure, and digital equity partnerships.

Alongside all this, I’ve never stopped serving locally. I was President of the Buna Chamber of Commerce. I co-founded Buna Regional Economic Development LLC. I serve on the board of the Buna Public Library and help guide it toward becoming a digital and cultural hub. I lead Bible studies, support Chrysalis and Emmaus ministries, and do what I can to serve the people and places God put in my path.

When I look back, what I see is not a career, but a calling. A life built on systems, yes—but more than that, a life built on faith, integrity, and quiet service. I’m still learning. Still building. Still showing up. And that, for me, is enough.

Chapter 9: Reflections at Sixty-Seven

There are moments in life when movies, memories, and years of lived experience weave themselves into a single thread. Looking back from sixty-seven, I can see how the stories that once entertained me now speak with deeper meaning.

Standing between darkness and light is perhaps the truest description of a full life. Some chapters are marked by brightness—family time, professional achievement, the satisfaction of work well done. Other chapters are marked by shadow—loss, grief, the weight of responsibilities that seem never-ending, the isolation that comes from carrying too much for too long.

At thirteen, I achieved something most people never accomplish. I earned the Eagle Scout rank. I received letters of commendation from the President. I was applauded at church. By every measure that mattered to the world, I had succeeded.

And underneath, something else was happening. Doubts. Shame. A sense of unworthiness. A lie that took root: that I was fundamentally wrong, that the gap between my public self and private self was proof of my corruption. I carried that lie for twenty-nine years before something finally broke it open.

In October 2000, at the age of 42, I attended a spiritual retreat. In three days, I experienced the realization that Jesus loves me—not abstractly, not theologically, but personally and completely. That moment alone saved me from what was coming.

Twenty months later, my son died. A car accident on a June morning. Everything I had imagined for the future simply ceased to exist. Grief does not fade because love does not fade. The ache remains because the bond remains. Missing him is not weakness—it is a sign that what we shared was real, sacred, and irreplaceable.

I have learned that we are shaped by forces larger than ourselves. A twelve-century inheritance of faith, determination, and service moves through me like water through limestone—invisible, persistent, shaping everything. The qualities that sustained my ancestors through exile and frontier hardship now drive me to carry weight that perhaps I should let others help with.

I have also learned that the weight I carry does not define me. What defines me is the love I choose, the faith I hold, the light I walk toward, and the redemption that meets me along the way.

At sixty-seven, this is what I know: Ordinary faithfulness—the kind that builds communities, sustains families, and endures through loss without losing its capacity to hope—is more powerful than any dramatic achievement. Quiet service matters. Showing up matters. Choosing people over systems matters. And grace is more real than any of us realize until we desperately need it.

I still feel like an eighteen-year-old with forty-nine years of experience. I still don’t feel completely sure of myself. But that never stops me from trying anyway. Life has been a mix of near-disasters, small victories, and occasional moments of brilliance. Through it all, I’ve realized that work was never just work—it was always purpose. And somehow, I’m still here, still learning, still trying.

For John Hargrove, PE—still becoming, still held by grace, still learning to carry his inheritance differently.

PART SIX: ONGOING JOURNEY

A Prayer Journey: Seven Movements Toward Wholeness

This prayer journey is not a formula to fix what feels broken. It is an invitation to walk slowly through the landscape of your soul with the One who made you and knows you completely.

Each of the seven movements addresses one of the challenges we have identified in reflection—not as problems to be solved, but as places where grace wants to meet you. The qualities that feel burdensome are not separate from the qualities that make you who you are. They are the shadow cast by your light. They are the places where your greatest strengths, pushed too far, begin to work against you.

Take as long as you need with each movement. There is no schedule. There is no deadline. The journey is the destination.

Movement One: The Weight You Were Never Meant to Carry Alone

You take on too much. The people who love you know this. And still the pattern continues—one more project, one more commitment, one more responsibility. This is not weakness. This is the shadow of your greatest strength. You have been given a capacity for responsibility that most people cannot imagine.

But notice what Scripture says about burdens: ‘Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ’ (Galatians 6:2). The law of Christ is mutual. The economy of grace is reciprocal. You were designed to give AND to receive. To carry AND to be carried.

When you take on every burden alone, you rob others of the opportunity to fulfill the law of Christ in their own lives. Your self-sufficiency, however well-intentioned, becomes a barrier to the very community you are trying to build.

A PRAYER FOR RELEASE:

Lord Jesus, You who carried the weight of the whole world’s sin on a cross, forgive me for believing I must carry every burden alone. Forgive me for the pride hidden in my self-sufficiency. Forgive me for robbing others of the chance to serve.

Teach me the grace of open hands. Show me which burdens are mine to carry and which I have picked up because I did not trust anyone else to carry them well. Give me the courage to set down what was never mine.

Send me fellow carriers. Not to replace my work, but to share it. In Your name, who yoked Yourself to us that we might find rest. Amen.

Movement Two: The Sabbath You Have Forgotten

You struggle to rest. The word itself may feel like accusation—rest, the thing you cannot do, the thing you have failed at. But rest is not laziness. Rest is trust made visible. When you rest, you declare with your body what your mouth may struggle to say: that the world does not depend on your continuous effort, that God is still at work when you are not.

God built rest into the structure of creation. Six days of work, one day of rest—not as punishment, but as gift. The Sabbath was made FOR you. It exists because you need it.

A PRAYER FOR SABBATH:

God of the seventh day, I confess that I have forgotten how to rest. I have made work my idol and productivity my measure. I have believed the lie that my worth depends on my output.

Teach me to stop. Teach me to breathe. Let my rest become an act of worship—a declaration that You are God and I am not. Give me the courage to close the laptop, silence the phone, and simply be. Restore the Sabbath to my life—not as burden, but as blessing. In the name of the One who rested on the seventh day. Amen.

Movement Three: The Grief That Has Not Been Given Its Due

You feel the weight of loss and expectations deeply. Perhaps more deeply than you have allowed yourself to acknowledge. The losses stack up—people gone, seasons ended, hopes deferred, dreams that shifted.

Because you are strong, because you are the one others lean on, you have not always given grief the space it demands. You have pushed through. But grief that is not grieved does not disappear. It goes underground. It becomes the weight you carry without naming.

Jesus did not say ‘Blessed are those who get over it quickly.’ He said ‘Blessed are those who mourn’ (Matthew 5:4). Mourning is not weakness. Mourning is the soul’s honest reckoning with reality. And the promise attached to mourning is not that the pain will vanish, but that comfort will come.

A PRAYER FOR MOURNING:

Lord of the valley of the shadow, I come to You with grief I have not fully named. I bring the losses I have pushed aside. I name them now: [Pause here and name what comes to mind—people, seasons, hopes, dreams.]

I do not ask You to take the grief away. I ask You to meet me in it. And in time, let the mourning bear its fruit. Let me become more tender toward others in their grief because I have faced my own. In the name of the Man of Sorrows, acquainted with grief. Amen.

Movement Four: The Perfection That Imprisons

Your perfectionism creates pressure instead of peace. The standard you hold for yourself is relentless, always just out of reach. This, too, is the shadow of a strength. You care deeply about excellence. But somewhere along the way, the pursuit of excellence became bondage to perfection—and perfection is not a gift from God but a demand from the enemy.

God does not require perfection from you. If He did, He would not have sent Jesus. The entire gospel is predicated on the assumption that you cannot be perfect, that you need a righteousness that is not your own.

And notice what Paul discovered: ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness’ (2 Corinthians 12:9). God’s power is made perfect in weakness—not in your strength, not in your flawless performance. In your weakness.

A PRAYER FOR IMPERFECTION:

Perfect God, I confess that I have tried to earn what can only be given. I have believed that my value depends on my performance. I have exhausted myself chasing a standard that was never required of me.

Teach me to embrace ‘good enough’ as gift, not compromise. Let my worth rest in the finished work of Christ rather than my own striving. Let my imperfections become windows where Your light breaks through. In the name of the One whose strength is made perfect in weakness. Amen.

Movement Five: The Help You Cannot Ask For

You have difficulty asking for help, especially when you are overwhelmed. The very moments when help is most needed are the moments when asking feels most impossible.

But listen: ‘Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their labor: If either of them falls down, one can help the other up. But pity anyone who falls and has no one to help them up’ (Ecclesiastes 4:9-10). The tragedy is not the falling—everyone falls. The tragedy is isolation.

Asking for help is not admission of defeat. It is acknowledgment of design. God made you for community. When you refuse to ask for help, you are rejecting the design of the Designer.

And consider this: there are people in your life who want to help you. Who are waiting for permission. Your refusal to ask is not protecting anyone—it is depriving them of the joy of giving.

A PRAYER FOR RECEIVING:

God who designed me for community, I confess that I have believed the lie of self-sufficiency. I have treated asking for help as weakness rather than wisdom.

Give me words to ask for what I need. Give me courage to be vulnerable with people who have earned my trust. Show me who is waiting. Open my eyes to the helpers You have placed in my path. In the name of the One who sent disciples in pairs, who washed feet, who asked a woman at a well for water. Amen.

Movement Six: The Silence That Swallows

You internalize stress until it becomes heavy silence. The weight you carry does not always show. It settles deeper, into the bones, into the places where words cannot reach.

David knew this silence. He wrote about it in Psalm 32:3, 5: ‘When I kept silent, my bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Then I acknowledged my sin to you and did not cover up my iniquity… and you forgave the guilt of my sin.’ But notice what broke the silence: acknowledgment. When David stopped keeping silent and started speaking—even speaking what was hard to say—forgiveness came. Release came.

Your silence may feel like strength. But silence that swallows is not strength. It is slow suffocation. The stress that is not spoken finds other ways to express itself: in the body, in the relationships, in the soul that gradually goes numb.

A PRAYER FOR VOICE:

God who speaks and creates, I confess that I have kept silent when I should have spoken. I have hidden my stress, my fear, my struggle behind a closed mouth and a calm face.

Give me words, Lord. Even inadequate words. Even stumbling words. Let me break the silence before it breaks me. Send me listeners who will not fix or dismiss. In the name of the Word made flesh, who speaks life into death. Amen.

Movement Seven: The Compassion That Has Run Dry

Compassion fatigue comes from long seasons of serving. You have given and given and given, and there are days when the well feels dry. This is not failure. This is physiology. This is the soul’s honest accounting of what has been spent without adequate replenishment.

Notice what the Shepherd does in Psalm 23:2-3: ‘He makes me lie down in green pastures, he leads me beside quiet waters, he restores my soul.’ The Shepherd MAKES the sheep lie down. The sheep does not restore itself. The sheep is restored by the Shepherd who knows that even the most devoted follower needs rest, needs quiet, needs restoration.

Compassion fatigue is not a sign that you have failed in love. It is a sign that you have loved so much, so long, so faithfully that you have depleted your reserves. The solution is not to try harder. The solution is to let the Shepherd lead you to quiet waters until the soul is restored.

A PRAYER FOR RESTORATION:

Good Shepherd, I am tired. Not the tiredness that a night’s sleep will fix, but the tiredness that has settled into my soul. I have cared for so many, for so long, that caring itself has become heavy.

Make me lie down, Lord. Lead me to quiet waters. Restore my soul. Let me receive before I give again. Let me be filled before I pour out. Refill what has been emptied. Restore what has been depleted. And in time, when the soul is restored, lead me back to service—not from depletion, but from overflow. In the name of the Shepherd who laid down His life for the sheep—and who rose again. Amen.

A Benediction for the Journey

May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will, and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. (Hebrews 13:20-21)

The journey does not end here. This prayer journey is not a destination but a beginning—a doorway into conversations with God that will continue for the rest of your life.

The challenges you have named are real. They will not disappear because you have prayed about them. But something shifts when we bring our struggles into the light. Something changes when we stop hiding our weaknesses and start offering them to God as the raw material of grace.

You are not a man who is “good” or “bad.” You are a man who is human—capable, flawed, hopeful, tired, resilient, and still becoming who you are meant to be. And in the hands of Jesus, even the difficult traits can be reshaped into strength. The parts that feel heavy today may become the very places where light breaks through tomorrow.

May the God of peace equip you with everything good. May He work in you what is pleasing to Him. May the weight you carry become lighter—not because you have set it all down, but because you have learned to carry it differently, and because you have let others carry it with you.

Go in peace. The Shepherd goes with you.

For John,
Still Becoming
Still Held

Appendices

Appendix A: Timeline of John Edwin Hargrove (1958–2025)

January 24, 1958 — Born in Kirbyville, Texas

1958–1964 — Early childhood in Buna; raised on 44 acres; deep exposure to family land and farming

1964–1965 — First grade, Buna schools (Mrs. Iris Pope)

1965–1970 — Elementary school years; school integration (1965); Hawaiian trip; summers on Neches River

1970–1971 — Seventh grade; Grand Canyon hike

1972 — Entered Buna High School

1973 — Earned Eagle Scout rank at age 13; 51 merit badges; Bronze Palms; Mile Swim

1973–1976 — High school years; strong academic performance (A’s and B’s, ranked 10th in class)

1975 — Met Leisa Smith during high school

1976 — Graduated from Buna High School

1976–1981 — Pre-engineering studies and electrical engineering degree at Lamar University

1978 — Began student engineering role at Gulf States Utilities (GSU)

March 7, 1980 — Married Leisa D. Smith

1981 — Graduated BSEE from Lamar University; began full-time engineering career

Mid-1980s — Licensed as Professional Engineer in Texas

April 1984 — Son Joshua Blake Hargrove born

1984–1993 — Career growth at GSU; sporadic church attendance; financial success

1993 — Left GSU as Entergy merger approached

1993–1995 — Consulting engineer at Lockard & White, Houston

1995 — Founded New Signals Engineering Corporation; initial headquarters in Conroe, then Buna

1996 — Designed fiber ring for City of College Station; began 25-year relationship with Sam Houston EC

1995–2000 — Financial success; increasing internal dissatisfaction; minimal spiritual engagement

October 2000 — Attended Walk to Emmaus #51; experienced spiritual awakening

Late 2000 — Began disciplined Bible study and prayer

2001 — Certified Lay Speaker, UMC Texas Conference; became Youth Director at Buna FUMC

November 30, 2001 — Movie night: Behind Enemy Lines with sons

December 1, 2001 — Movie night: Spy Game with Joshua at Taste of China

June 22, 2002 — Joshua died in automobile accident

2002–2005 — Served as Youth Directors at Buna FUMC with Leisa; led home Bible study for youth

2003 — Led Beaumont District Summer Camp (high school group)

2003–present — Served in leadership roles for Emmaus Walks and Chrysalis Flights

2005 — Licensed Minister of the Gospel, World Ministry Fellowship

2006 — Certified Faith-Based Counselor (IIFBC, Beaumont)

2006–2014 — Continued New Signals Engineering; worked with utilities, municipalities, oil & gas

2013 — Father Robert Hargrove died at age 85

2015 — Joined Sam Houston Electric Cooperative as Engineer II

2015–2018 — Led AMI deployment (72,000 meters); re-architected WAN

2019 — Became Chief Technology Officer, East Texas Electric Cooperative

2020 — Launched rural WISP in response to COVID-19 connectivity crisis

2020–2022 — Built WISP from scratch; reached ~725 customers, ~$55,000/month revenue

2023 — Returned to Lockard & White; became COO, Evergreen Technology Solutions

2023–2025 — Led broadband, VOIP, public safety, and community infrastructure projects

2023–2025 — President (past), Buna Chamber of Commerce

February 2023 — Co-founded Buna Regional Economic Development LLC

December 2022 — Joined board of Buna Public Library

Late 2023/Early 2024 — Started Medicare and Social Security; continued full-time work

January 24, 2025 — Age 67; still active in engineering, mentoring, writing, ministry, and community service

Appendix B: Essential Facts About John Edwin Hargrove

PERSONAL INFORMATION
Full Name: John Edwin Hargrove
Date of Birth: January 24, 1958
Place of Birth: Kirbyville, Jasper County, Texas
Current Age: 67

FAMILY
Parents: Robert Edwin Hargrove (d. 2013); Lavee Richbourg Hargrove
Spouse: Leisa D. Smith (married March 7, 1980)
Child: Joshua Blake Hargrove (April 1984 – June 22, 2002)
Primary Residence: 786 FM 253 Rd, Buna, TX

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE)
Lamar University, 1981

PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE
Professional Engineer, State of Texas (licensed mid-1980s)
Life Member, IEEE
Honor Societies: Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi

SPIRITUAL
Christened United Methodist (birth to age 20; sporadic until age 42; lay positions 1980–2005)
Certified Lay Speaker, UMC Texas Conference (2001)
Licensed Minister of the Gospel, World Ministry Fellowship (2005)
Certified Faith-Based Counselor, International Institute of Faith-Based Counseling, Beaumont (2006)
Non-denominational faith studies and ministry (2005–present)

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Gulf States Utilities (1978–1993) — 15 years; telecommunications engineering
Lockard & White, Houston (1993–1995) — Major infrastructure projects
New Signals Engineering Corporation (founded 1995; operated 1995–2014)
Sam Houston Electric Cooperative (2015–2018) — Engineer II; AMI deployment lead
East Texas Electric Cooperative (2019) — Chief Technology Officer
Rural Wireless ISP (WISP) (2020–2022) — Founded and built from scratch
Lockard & White (2023–present) — Senior Telecommunications Engineer
Evergreen Technology Solutions (2023–present) — Chief Operating Officer

COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP
President, Buna Chamber of Commerce (past, 2023–2025)
Co-founder, Buna Regional Economic Development LLC (Feb 2023)
Board Member, Buna Public Library (Dec 2022–present)
Youth Director, Buna FUMC (2002–2005, with spouse Leisa)
Lay Speaker and Bible study leader (2001–present)
Emmaus and Chrysalis retreat leader (2003–present)

ANCESTRAL HERITAGE
Direct ancestral heritage traces through English colonial families (Virginia, Carolinas, Georgia),
French Huguenot refugees (Richbourg/Richebourg line), Scots-Irish pioneers, and early Texas settlers.
Connects to documented medieval British gentry and royal lines. Approximately 1,465 documented
ancestors spanning 12+ centuries.

Appendix C: A Final Reflection

Standing at the threshold of the later chapters of life, I am able to see the arc of the story more clearly than I could while living it. The achievements, the failures, the losses, the grace—they form a pattern that makes sense now in a way it did not before.

I am the forty-third generation of a line that began when kings wore simple crowns and the world was harder and older. I carry in my blood the faith of Huguenots who crossed an ocean rather than abandon their convictions. I inherit the stubborn determination of pioneers who built communities in swamps and forests and deserts. I am shaped by teachers and mentors who believed in me when I did not believe in myself. I am marked by the love of a wife who chose me and has stood beside me for forty-five years. I am haunted—in the most beautiful way—by the memory of a son whose eighteen years taught me what matters most.

If there is a lesson that ties it all together, it is this: ordinary faithfulness is more powerful than we know. The quiet work of showing up, of serving, of building things that last, of choosing people over systems, of learning to receive as well as give—these things are not glamorous. They do not make headlines. But they change lives. They build communities. They endure.

I do not know what comes next. But I know Whose hands hold the future. And I know that grace is real, that redemption is always possible, and that the story is never finished as long as we are still becoming.

To anyone reading this: May you know that you are not alone in your struggle. May you learn earlier than I did that asking for help honors both the giver and the receiver. May you understand that your worth was settled long ago, not by your achievements but by the One who made you and calls you beloved. And may you discover, as I am finally learning, that the weight we carry becomes lighter when we learn to carry it together, and that grace is available for every step of the journey.

Still becoming. Still held. Still learning.

This is the life of John Edwin Hargrove.

Peace

In the wake of the tragic fatal shootings in Minneapolis involving federal immigration agents, Minnesota communities are experiencing widespread unrest, protests, and deep divisions. Two U.S. citizens — Renée Good and Alex Pretti — have been killed during federal immigration enforcement operations, sparking ongoing demonstrations and a statewide general strike. Local business leaders have publicly urged calm and de-escalation amid rising tensions. 

At a time of heightened emotion and public concern, it is vital that state and local officials exercise leadership that strengthens peace, upholds the rule of law, and protects every citizen’s safety. To that end, officials should:

Temper inflammatory or polarizing political rhetoric that may broaden conflict or deepen distrust between community members and law enforcement, including rhetoric that is perceived as antagonistic toward federal law enforcement entities or specific groups. Work collaboratively with law enforcement at all levels to enforce existing curfews, maintain public order, and ensure that protests and gatherings remain peaceful and lawful. Peaceful protest is a protected right — but safety for all participants, bystanders, and residents must be prioritized. Facilitate clear and consistent communication to the public about expectations for conduct, curfew hours, and legal boundaries, reducing confusion and enabling peaceful civic engagement. Support transparent investigation and accountability for the use of force in these incidents, recognizing legitimate concerns while ensuring due process and respect for constitutional protections.

A leadership posture grounded in unity, respect for legal process, and commitment to public safety will help restore calm and foster a constructive environment for both accountability and healing.

#Minnesota #LawAndOrder #Peace #PublicSafety #ResponsibleLeadership

Using Spark Leadership to Avoid Dysfunction and Burnout

Photo by Felix Mittermeier on Pexels.com

Leadership frameworks usually focus on how to inspire others. What they talk about far less is how leaders quietly burn out while doing it.

That risk is especially high for people who are competent, dependable, and willing to step in when things start to wobble. In small organizations, rural communities, nonprofits, utilities, and volunteer-driven environments, leadership often defaults to whoever will carry the load. Over time, that turns into chronic over-functioning.

Spark leadership, used intentionally, can be a way out of that trap — not by doing more, but by doing less of the wrong things.

Here is how I have come to think about it.

Spark is ignition, not sustained combustion

A spark is meant to start something, not keep it burning forever. If the same person is constantly supplying the heat, the system never develops its own energy. Burnout is not a personal failure; it is often a signal that the leader has become the permanent engine.

Using Spark leadership well means learning when to ignite and when to step back.

Share information as a boundary, not a burden

Transparency is often framed as kindness or trust-building. In practice, it is also a boundary-setting tool.

When I share information clearly — risks, constraints, tradeoffs, consequences — I am doing my part. What I no longer assume is responsibility for what others choose not to do with that information.

There is a difference between clarity and rescue.

Clarity says, “Here is what is happening.”

Rescue says, “And I will make sure it doesn’t hurt anyone.”

If discomfort follows clarity, that is not dysfunction. That is a system waking up.

Ask for input, then require ownership

Inviting input without requiring ownership creates a subtle form of burnout. Ideas get shared, refined, and improved — and then quietly added to one person’s workload.

A healthier Spark practice is to follow every request for input with a simple question:

Who is willing to own this?

Not who agrees with it. Not who likes it. Who will carry it.

Ideas without owners are not commitments. Letting them remain ideas protects both the leader and the organization.

Play to strengths without covering for gaps

Strength-based leadership is often misunderstood as smoothing everything out. In reality, it means aligning people where they are effective and allowing gaps to be visible elsewhere.

When leaders constantly compensate for missing skills, unclear roles, or weak follow-through, the system learns the wrong lesson: that someone else will always fix it.

Letting gaps stay visible creates pressure for growth, re-design, or honest conversation. Absorbing those gaps just delays the inevitable — at your expense.

Keep commitments, but stop making implied ones

Reliability builds trust. It also attracts dependency.

One of the most important burnout-prevention moves I’ve learned is to stop making implied commitments. If I did not explicitly say yes, it is not mine. If no one asked, I am not obligated. If ownership was unclear, I am not the default.

Keeping commitments does not mean keeping everyone else’s.

Let Spark develop others, not replace them

The healthiest use of Spark leadership is developmental, not compensatory. The question is not “How do I keep this from failing?” but “Who needs to grow so this doesn’t depend on me?”

That shift feels risky at first. Things may wobble. Some people may resist. A few may leave. But what emerges is a system that can breathe without one person holding it together.

Burnout thrives in silence and substitution. Spark leadership, used well, replaces both with clarity and shared responsibility.

And in the long run, that is not just better leadership — it is more sustainable life.

Will Christians Be Spared Trials? What the Bible Actually Promises

Photo by M Sidharda on Pexels.com

One of the quiet assumptions many believers carry—often without realizing it—is that faith should somehow shield us from hardship. When trials come, they can feel confusing or even destabilizing: If God is faithful, why am I still suffering? Scripture addresses this question directly, and its answer is both sobering and deeply hopeful.

The Bible does not promise Christians a trial-free life. What it does promise is something far better: God’s presence, preservation, and ultimate deliverance.

Trials Are Not an Accident

The New Testament is remarkably honest about the Christian life. Suffering is not presented as a failure of faith, nor as a sign of God’s absence.

Paul tells the Thessalonian church that trials should not surprise them, because “you know that we are destined for them” (1 Thessalonians 3:3). That single statement overturns the idea that hardship is an anomaly. Trials are part of the calling of discipleship in a fallen world.

Jesus Himself warned His followers that obedience would not lead to ease, but to opposition. Faith places us in alignment with God’s kingdom—and that alignment often brings friction with the world as it is.

God Knows How to Rescue the Godly

Acknowledging trials does not mean resignation to despair. Scripture is equally clear that God is not passive in the suffering of His people.

Peter writes, “The Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials” (2 Peter 2:9). Notice what the verse does—and does not—say. It does not say God prevents all trials. It says He knows how to rescue His people from them.

That rescue may take different forms:

sustaining faith under pressure, moral protection in the midst of temptation, or final deliverance when God brings history to its appointed end.

Peter himself endured imprisonment and martyrdom, yet still testified to God’s rescuing power. For him, rescue did not mean avoidance; it meant faith preserved and hope fulfilled.

“Kept From” Does Not Always Mean “Removed”

Photo by eberhard grossgasteiger on Pexels.com

Revelation 3:10 is often quoted as a promise of exemption from suffering: “I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world.”

The language is important. The word “keep” in Scripture frequently means to guard or to preserve, not necessarily to remove from a situation entirely. Jesus uses the same idea in His prayer when He asks the Father not to take His disciples out of the world, but to keep them from the evil one.

In Revelation, the promise is not comfort or ease, but protection during a defined period of global testing. The emphasis is on God’s sovereignty and faithfulness, not on escape from all difficulty.

Watchfulness Assumes Ongoing Testing

Jesus’ warning in Matthew 25:13—“Keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour”—only makes sense if believers remain engaged in a world marked by uncertainty and pressure.

If Christians were guaranteed removal before hardship, vigilance would be unnecessary. Watchfulness, endurance, and faithfulness are repeated themes precisely because trials remain part of the journey until Christ’s return.

The Pattern of Scripture Is Preservation Through, Not Removal From

When we step back and look at the whole biblical story, a consistent pattern emerges:

Noah was preserved through the flood, not taken away before it came. Israel was protected within Egypt during the plagues. Daniel was saved in the lions’ den. The early church grew stronger under persecution.

God’s people are repeatedly exposed to hardship—but never abandoned to it.

What Christians Are Actually Promised

The Bible makes these promises clear:

Christians are not promised a life without trials. They are promised God’s sustaining presence. They are promised protection from God’s final wrath. They are promised ultimate vindication, resurrection, and restoration.

Trials test the world.

Trials refine and reveal genuine faith.

A Final Word

Christian hope is not rooted in avoidance of suffering, but in confidence that suffering does not have the final word. God does not promise to keep His people from every storm—but He does promise to keep them in the storm and to bring them safely home.

Faith is not the absence of trials.

It is trust that God is faithful in the midst of them.

A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT FOR EVERY AMERICAN, REGARDLESS OF PARTY


The Founders called this republic an experiment. Madison said so explicitly. Hamilton opened the Federalist Papers asking whether societies of men are capable of governing themselves by “reflection and choice” — or whether they are forever destined to be governed by “accident and force.”

That question has never been permanently answered. It gets re-answered by each generation’s behavior.

Here is the experiment. Four variables. Be honest with yourself about all four.


Variable 1: The Constitution was built to change — but HOW you change it matters.

Article V provides two deliberate pathways for amendment. The Founders used them immediately — the Bill of Rights was ratified within three years of the Constitution itself. They were not building a frozen monument. They were building a process. Madison wrote that the greatness of the American people is that they “have not suffered a blind veneration for the past.”

The experiment: When you want the Constitution to mean something different, do you use the process — or do you use power to bypass the process? One is self-government. The other is the thing self-government was designed to prevent.


Variable 2: The Founders themselves were never unanimous — and they knew it.

Three delegates refused to sign the Constitution. Rhode Island boycotted the convention entirely. Ratification was close and contentious in nearly every state. Loyalists — perhaps a third of the colonial population — were never part of the founding consensus at all. Hamilton acknowledged in Federalist 1 that “wise and good men” would be found on both sides of the ratifying debate, and that honest opposition would “spring from sources blameless at least, if not respectable.”

The experiment: If the Founders — who had fought a war together, knew each other personally, and shared enormous common ground — could not achieve unanimity, why do we treat the other side’s disagreement as evidence of bad faith rather than honest difference?


Variable 3: Facts versus narrative — the one problem the Founders did not solve.

Madison’s great structural cure for faction was the extended republic — the idea that geographic distance and diversity would prevent any single passion from simultaneously inflaming the entire country. A pamphlet in Virginia took weeks to reach Massachusetts. The friction of distance cooled factional contagion.

That friction is gone. Every citizen now receives the same emotional signal simultaneously, curated for maximum reaction. Madison in Federalist 63 wrote that the Senate’s purpose was to protect the people “against their own temporary errors and delusions” until “reason, justice, and truth can regain their authority over the public mind.” He assumed truth would regain authority, given time and space.

The experiment: What happens to a republic designed around deliberation when the information environment is specifically engineered to prevent deliberation — and when “news” and “fact” have become functionally indistinguishable to millions of citizens? This is the one variable the Founders anticipated but could not design around. It is ours to solve or to fail.


Variable 4: The permanent political class — the pig at the trough problem.

Hamilton in Federalist 1 identified the most dangerous class of men in any republic: those who “aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country” — men whose personal interest is permanently tied to the perpetuation of conflict rather than its resolution. He was describing the career politician before the career politician existed as a recognizable type.

The Constitution sets no term limits on Congress. The Founders debated this and chose not to impose them, trusting the election mechanism to rotate citizens in and out. What they did not anticipate was a professional class for whom holding office is the vocation — not a temporary sacrifice of a productive citizen, but a permanent extraction from the republic’s resources.

Madison in Federalist 47 called the accumulation of all power in the same hands “the very definition of tyranny.” A legislator who has held office for thirty years, whose personal wealth has multiplied through that tenure, who has converted public power into private benefit through earmarks and special interests — is not serving the republic. By Madison’s own definition, they are the faction.

The experiment: Does this apply only to the career politicians on the other side — or does it apply equally to the ones you keep re-electing?


The control variable — the one that determines whether the experiment succeeds or fails:

Orwell noticed, in Animal Farm, that the pigs did not become what they replaced by dramatic revolution. They became it gradually, by the slow logic of occupying power long enough that the distinction between serving the farm and owning the farm disappeared.

Hamilton’s question — reflection and choice, or accident and force — is not asked once at the founding and answered forever. It is asked again every time a citizen decides whether to apply their principles consistently or only when convenient.

The republic is not a partisan inheritance. It was built by people who disagreed profoundly, on a framework designed to contain disagreement without destroying the disagreers.

It will be kept — or lost — by whether we can still do the same.


Sources: Federalist No. 1 (Hamilton), Federalist No. 10, 47, 51, 63 (Madison) · Article V, United States Constitution · Madison, Federalist 14 on constitutional change · Hamilton, Federalist 1 on the permanent political class

JOHN 6 

JOHN 6  ·  A PLAIN-LANGUAGE OVERVIEW

What Happened, What It Means, and Why the Early Church Cared So Much

Source of Old Faith Church  ·  March 2026  ·  Class Overview

Part One · What John 6 Is About

John 6 opens with a crowd following Jesus across a lake because they saw him heal people. He feeds more than five thousand of them with five small loaves of bread and two fish, with twelve baskets of food left over. That night his disciples set out by boat, and Jesus walks across the water to meet them. The next day the crowd finds him on the other side, confused about how he got there.

Then Jesus starts talking — and the conversation gets difficult fast.

He tells them plainly that they are only looking for him because they got a free meal. He tells them not to work for food that spoils, but for food that lasts forever. When they ask what that food is, he says: it is himself. ‘I am the bread of life,’ he says. ‘Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.’

The crowd pushes back. They know his parents. He is from Nazareth. How can he say he ‘came down from heaven’?

Jesus does not back down. He goes further. He says that no one can even come to him unless God draws them first — that coming to him is not something people manage on their own. And then he says something that shocks everyone in the room: unless you eat his flesh and drink his blood, you have no life in you.

People start leaving. Even many of his closer followers say this teaching is too hard. By the end of the chapter, the crowd has thinned dramatically. Jesus turns to the twelve disciples and asks: do you want to leave too? Peter speaks for the group: ‘Lord, where else would we go? You have the words of eternal life.’

Part Two · The Three Questions the Chapter Forces

1.  Does God decide who comes to Jesus — or do people decide for themselves?

This is the question your class landed on first, and it is a real one. Jesus says in verse 44 that no one can come to him unless the Father draws them. He says it again in verse 65. That sounds like God is in control of who responds.

But earlier in the same chapter — and throughout John’s Gospel — Jesus invites, welcomes, and appeals to people to believe. He says in John 3:16 that God so loved the world. The same chapter contains both things.

The honest answer is that John holds both without resolving them. God moves first. People still respond or refuse. The class’s observation was exactly right: when someone begins seeking God, that seeking is itself evidence that God is already at work in them. The two are not opposites — they are sequential. God moves; the person responds to that movement.

This question has been debated by serious, faithful Christians for fifteen centuries. It has not been settled because the text holds both edges without letting go of either.

2.  What does it mean to eat his flesh and drink his blood?

This language caused people to walk away in the first century, and it still makes readers uncomfortable today. The class was right to notice it sounds extreme.

It helps to remember that John’s Gospel is full of this kind of picture language. Jesus is also described as living water, as light, as the door, as the vine. None of those are meant to be taken in a flat, physical way. ‘Eating his flesh and drinking his blood’ is the most intense version of a consistent pattern: Jesus is the source of life, and receiving him has to go all the way down.

It is picture language for total dependence. To eat and drink is to take something inside you that keeps you alive. Jesus is saying: that is what I am to you, spiritually. There is no life that does not come through me.

Whether this also connects to the Lord’s Supper is a question Christians have answered differently for two thousand years. What is clear from the chapter itself is that the primary meaning is about receiving Christ through faith — trusting him so completely that sustaining life apart from him becomes unthinkable.

3.  Why did so many people leave?

Because they had come for something else. The crowd followed Jesus across a lake because they had eaten free bread the day before. They were hoping for more of what they already understood: provision, healing, maybe a leader who would deal with the Romans.

What Jesus offered was different in kind, not just in degree. He was not offering a better version of what they already wanted. He was reorienting their wants altogether. And that is a much harder ask.

Their leaving was not a failure of Jesus’s communication. It was a disclosure of their motivation. The teaching did not drive them away — it revealed why they had come.

Peter’s response is the counterpoint to all of it: ‘Where else would we go?’ Not ‘I understand everything you said.’ Not ‘This all makes sense to me now.’ Just — there is nowhere else. This is the only place where words reach all the way to eternal life. That is enough to stay.

Part Three · What Five Early Christians Saw in This Chapter

Within a generation of John’s Gospel being written, Christian leaders were already wrestling deeply with it. Five of them are worth knowing by name — not because they had all the answers, but because the questions they faced help us understand why this chapter matters so much.

Ignatius of Antioch  (died around AD 107)

Ignatius was a bishop in Syria who possibly knew the Apostle John personally. He was arrested and sent to Rome to be executed, and he wrote letters to churches along the way.

The error he fought was a teaching that said Jesus only appeared to be human — that he looked like a real person but was not actually made of flesh and blood. Ignatius saw this as devastating. If Jesus did not genuinely suffer and die, then his death means nothing. If his body was not real, then the bread and cup of communion are empty gestures.

For Ignatius, John 6 was a direct answer to this problem. Jesus said his flesh is real food and his blood is real drink. That only matters if the flesh and blood are real.

Irenaeus of Lyon  (died around AD 202)

Irenaeus was a bishop in what is now southern France. He had a living connection to the apostles through his teacher Polycarp, who had known the Apostle John.

The error he fought was a movement that taught the physical world was either evil or a mistake — that the true God had nothing to do with creation, that Jesus was a purely spiritual being sent to liberate souls from the trap of matter, and that only certain people with secret knowledge could be saved.

Irenaeus used John 6 to show that this gets Jesus exactly backwards. Jesus does not offer escape from the physical world. He enters it. He takes bread in his hands. He feeds five thousand real people who are physically hungry. The Word became flesh — that is the center of the Gospel, not the escape from flesh.

John Chrysostom  (died AD 407)

Chrysostom — the nickname means ‘golden-mouthed’ — was one of the greatest preachers in church history. He became the Archbishop of Constantinople, the most powerful church post in the eastern Roman empire, and was eventually exiled twice for preaching too directly against the wealthy and the powerful. He died on a forced march through the mountains.

What he saw in John 6 was primarily a pastoral picture: Jesus using hard teaching to separate genuine followers from people who were only there for what they could get. The crowd’s departure, for Chrysostom, was not a tragedy. It was the teaching doing exactly what it was supposed to do. And Peter’s response — ‘where else would we go’ — was not triumphant faith. It was honest, incomplete, loyal faith. You do not have to understand everything. You have to know there is nowhere else to go.

Cyril of Alexandria  (died AD 444)

Cyril was the Archbishop of Alexandria in Egypt and one of the most precise theological thinkers the early church produced. He spent much of his life fighting a teaching that said Jesus was essentially two people — a divine being living inside a human body, the way someone lives in a house — rather than one genuinely united person who was fully God and fully human at the same time.

This mattered for John 6 because the whole point of eating Jesus’s flesh depends on what that flesh actually is. If Jesus is merely a very holy man with God living inside him, then his flesh is just ordinary flesh. But if Jesus is genuinely God become human — one person, not two — then his flesh carries divine life within it, and receiving him goes all the way to the life of God.

Augustine of Hippo  (died AD 430)

Augustine was a North African bishop whose influence on Western Christianity — Catholic and Protestant alike — is greater than almost any other single figure. Luther was shaped by him. Calvin quoted him constantly. Both sides of the Reformation appealed to him.

Before becoming a Christian he had spent years unable to change despite wanting to — knowing what was right and being unable to do it consistently. That experience made him take very seriously Paul’s teaching about the human will being genuinely broken, not just weak.

When he read verse 44 — ‘no one can come to me unless the Father draws him’ — he took it literally. People do not come to God under their own steam. The very desire to seek God is itself a gift. Left entirely to itself, the human will turns away from God, not toward him. God has to move first.

His most famous line on this passage: give me a person who is truly in love with God, and they will know exactly what this drawing feels like — a pull that is not their own manufacturing. That is what he believed John 6:44 was describing.

WHAT ALL FIVE AGREED ON

Despite their different concerns and different centuries, all five of these men read John 6 and came to the same basic conclusion: Jesus is not offering better religion. He is offering himself — actually, completely, as the source of life. And the question the chapter puts to everyone who reads it is the same question it put to the crowd that day: is that what you came for?

Prepared for Source of Old Faith Church  ·  John Hargrove  ·  March 2026

Signal tracing

There is a quiet lesson in the way engineers trace a signal.

Signal tracing is not complicated. You find the source. You follow the line. You locate every place the signal was lost, degraded, or redirected. And then you ask: what was the original transmission? What was it always trying to say?

Life with God is often very much like that.

Over time the signal of our life can become noisy. Wounds, disappointments, fear, and the voices of others can introduce distortion. The message that once felt clear begins to sound faint. We begin to wonder if the signal was ever there at all.

But the signal did not begin with the noise.

Scripture reminds us that our lives began with a transmission from God Himself. Before the world grew loud, the message was simple: you are loved, you are called, and you belong to Him.

Just as an engineer traces a circuit back to the source, the soul can trace its life back to the heart of God. When we do, we begin to recognize where the signal was weakened — where fear spoke louder than faith, where the world redirected what God originally spoke.

The good news is that the Source has never changed.

God’s message toward us has never degraded. His voice is still transmitting the same truth it always has. Through Jesus Christ the line is restored, the signal strengthened, and the message becomes clear again.

You are not lost.
You are not forgotten.
The signal is still there.

Sometimes the most faithful thing we can do is simply trace our way back to the Source and listen again.

“Draw near to God, and He will draw near to you.” — James 4:8

Today, take a moment to quiet the noise. Follow the line of your life back to where it began. Listen carefully.

The original transmission is still speaking.

#Faith
#Encouragement
#GodIsStillSpeaking
#Hope
#JesusRestores

Echoes

Photo by Lukas Rodriguez on Pexels.com

There are certain moments in my life that never really passed.

They don’t stay where they happened. They come forward with me. They surface when I least expect them, like sound traveling across still water.

I’ve come to think of them as echoes.

Photo by Matteo Di Iorio on Pexels.com

One of the first echoes always takes me back to the Neches River.

Early morning fog would hang over the water so thick that the far bank disappeared. The river would be quiet in that particular East Texas way — a stillness broken only by the slow movement of water and the occasional sound of a bird somewhere in the trees.

Photo by Emre Keskinol on Pexels.com

My father had a camp on the banks of the Neches.

Inside that camp was where the mornings began.

Eggs in a skillet. Bacon frying. Biscuits warming. Coffee on the stove. The smell of breakfast filling that small room while the fog still drifted across the river outside.

Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

I can still see my dad’s hands working over that stove.

At the time it just felt normal. Breakfast. A river morning. A father and a son starting the day.

I didn’t know then that those moments were planting something in me that would stay for the rest of my life.

That is one of the echoes.

Another one lives in a Hobby Lobby aisle.

It was 1999. Joshua was fifteen.

Leisa had wandered off to the yarn section, looking at colors and textures the way she always does when she’s planning something creative. Meanwhile Joshua and I drifted toward the model section where the airplanes and boats were.

We started looking at the kits.

Then something shifted the way it sometimes does between a father and a teenage son.

Mock kung fu.

Light punches to the arm. Ridiculous stances. Both of us pretending to be serious fighters while clearly not being serious at all. We were laughing and half wrestling right there between the shelves.

Just being silly.

When Leisa finally came looking for us, she found us still fooling around in the aisle and just shook her head.

I remember Joshua laughing.

At the time it felt like nothing special. Just a small family moment in the middle of a normal day.

But memory has a way of holding onto things like that.

That moment became an echo.

Recently another echo came while I was scrolling through old photographs.

Leisa and I had just marked forty-six years of marriage. I posted something about it — how we started going steady in the 1970s, married in 1980 while we were still in college, living in married student housing at Lamar in Beaumont and barely making it in those early years.

After posting, I started scrolling back through the years.

Photos from the early 1980s began appearing.

Young parents. A tiny Joshua. Family gatherings. Aunts and uncles who have been gone for years now.

Scrolling through old photographs does something strange to time.

You are sitting in the present, but suddenly you are also standing in a living room forty years ago. The people are alive again for a moment. Their voices almost feel close enough to hear.

Time folds in on itself.

Then there is Joshua’s poem.

Part of it is on his headstone now.

He wrote about echoes in eternity.

When he wrote those words he was just a young man thinking deeply about life and meaning. None of us could have imagined how those words would come to rest in stone.

But they did.

And they echo now.

Some echoes are quieter than all the others.

Late 1984.

Three in the morning.

Our house was dark except for the blue light of the television. I had put a VHS tape of Star Wars: A New Hope into the player.

Joshua was just a baby then — maybe six or seven months old.

He had settled against my chest on the couch, the way babies do when they finally relax into sleep. His small body rose and fell slowly with each breath.

Every father knows that moment.

When a baby falls asleep on your chest you stop moving. Completely. You barely breathe. You don’t shift positions. You don’t adjust anything.

You stay still because the sleeping matters more than the comfortable.

So I stayed there.

The movie played quietly while John Williams’ music filled the room and stars drifted across the screen.

Joshua didn’t know what the movie was.

But he knew that heartbeat under his ear.

He knew he was safe.

Eventually he settled deeper into sleep while the night passed around us.

That moment never left me.

It became another echo.

Over the years I have started to understand something about echoes.

They aren’t just memories.

They are reminders of what mattered.

My father’s camp on the Neches River.

Breakfast inside that little building while fog hung over the water.

A ridiculous kung fu match with my fifteen-year-old son in a Hobby Lobby aisle.

Forty-six years of marriage with Leisa.

A poem about eternity written by a young man who didn’t know how those words would live on.

A baby asleep on my chest at three in the morning while stars moved across a television screen.

None of those moments felt extraordinary when they were happening.

But echoes rarely come from extraordinary moments.

They come from love lived in ordinary places.

And sometimes, when the evening grows quiet, I find myself thinking about a photograph.

Joshua as a baby.

Sitting in a chair.

His arms stretched wide open toward the world.

And there is still something I wish I could say to him again.

I love you, son.

So very much.

Beyond my ability to use words.

#Echoes
#NechesRiver
#FathersAndSons
#LoveThatRemains

How to Stay Informed Without Losing Your Peace

We are living in a loud time.

Every headline feels urgent.
Every crisis feels existential.
Every commentator sounds certain that civilization is either collapsing or being reborn.

Wars, borders, debt, courts, identity politics, migration, technology disruption, institutional distrust — it is not that these issues are imaginary. They are real. But the way they are delivered to us is often engineered for intensity, not clarity.

If we are not careful, we can mistake constant activation for informed citizenship.

The question is not whether we should pay attention.

The question is how to do so without surrendering our peace.


The Problem Is Not Information. It Is Velocity and Framing.

Never in history has so much analysis been so instantly available.

But information today arrives with:

  • Emotional amplification
  • Moral urgency
  • Binary framing (good vs evil, us vs them)
  • Apocalyptic undertones

This activates the nervous system.

Your body does not distinguish between:

  • A real physical threat
  • A well-written article describing a threat

If your intake is constant, your stress becomes constant.

That is not wisdom. That is overload.


Comprehension Requires Structure

Most people consume news reactively:

  • A link appears.
  • A headline provokes.
  • A thread escalates.
  • A video confirms bias.
  • Another opinion intensifies it.

There is no system. Only stimulus.

Comprehension requires discipline.

A simple structure can change everything:

  1. Start with facts, not commentary.
    What actually happened? Who confirmed it? Is there a primary document?
  2. Separate reporting from interpretation.
    Facts are events. Interpretations are conclusions layered on top.
  3. Ask what is known, what is assumed, and what is speculative.
  4. Limit intake.
    If you cannot summarize it in five sentences, you have likely consumed too much noise.
  5. End with a decision:
    Does this require action from me?
    If not, release it.

Most of What Feels Urgent Does Not Require Your Immediate Action

This is the quiet truth most people resist.

Global conflict, demographic shifts, monetary policy, institutional tension — these are structural forces. They unfold over years, not hours.

You are not responsible for solving civilization before lunch.

What you are responsible for:

  • Your household.
  • Your integrity.
  • Your work.
  • Your community.
  • Your posture toward others.

Peace comes when we re-anchor to what is within reach.


Fear Is Contagious. So Is Contempt.

Modern political commentary often carries two toxins:

  • Fear of collapse
  • Contempt for opponents

Fear destabilizes.
Contempt hardens.

Both reduce clarity.

Comprehension improves when we:

  • Assume complexity rather than conspiracy.
  • Assume partial truth rather than total deception.
  • Recognize that even flawed systems are rarely pure villainy.

You do not have to deny problems to avoid hysteria.


Transition Is Not Collapse

Many writers frame our moment as civilizational decline.

History suggests something more nuanced.

Societies move through:

  • Expansion
  • Saturation
  • Correction
  • Realignment

Corrections are uncomfortable.
Realignments are noisy.

But turbulence is not the same as termination.

The West has endured:

  • World wars
  • Nuclear brinkmanship
  • Economic depression
  • Cultural revolutions
  • Domestic unrest

Every generation believes it stands at the edge of the abyss.

Most do not.


A Weekly Discipline That Protects Your Mind

Instead of constant scrolling:

  • 15 minutes daily: one straight reporting source, one differing viewpoint.
  • One deeper review weekly: verify one issue thoroughly.
  • One synthesis page: what is known, what is uncertain, what to watch.

Then stop.

Peace grows in limits.


The Spiritual Dimension

There is also a deeper layer.

News consumption reveals what we trust.

If every headline shakes you, perhaps your stability is anchored to political outcomes rather than enduring truths.

A helpful closing question each week:

  • What fear did this news try to activate?
  • What virtue would counter that fear?
    • Courage?
    • Patience?
    • Charity?
    • Prudence?

Peace is not ignorance.
It is ordered awareness.


The Goal Is Not Withdrawal. It Is Steadiness.

We should not become uninformed.
But neither should we become inflamed.

Stay informed enough to act wisely.
Stay grounded enough to sleep peacefully.
Stay humble enough to admit uncertainty.
Stay hopeful enough to build locally.

Civilization is not maintained primarily by commentary.

It is maintained by people who:

  • Build.
  • Teach.
  • Repair.
  • Serve.
  • Raise families.
  • Strengthen institutions.
  • Practice self-governance.

If you are doing that, you are participating in the preservation of order more than any headline can undo.

Read carefully.
Verify patiently.
Limit intake.
Anchor locally.
Guard your spirit.

Comprehension is clarity.

Peace is choosing not to let the noise rule your interior life.

“The Voice That Commands”

Text: John 5:1–9, 17–24, 39–40 Preaching aim: To move the congregation from curiosity about Jesus to reckoning with Jesus — and to show that the voice that healed a man at a pool is the same voice that will raise the dead, and that hearing it now is the only thing that matters.

INTRODUCTION — The Congregation Already Knows This Story

Open by acknowledging that a group in this church has been living inside John 5 all week. They have been thinking about it, preparing for it, bringing their questions. But the sermon is not a repeat of the Deeper Dive — it is the next layer underneath it.

Ask a single orienting question to the whole room, said slowly and without pressure:

“When/as Jesus walks toward you, what do you hope He is going to say — and are you prepared for the possibility that He might say something different?”

That question is the door into the whole sermon.

I. A Man Who Stopped Asking — John 5:1–9

The scene: Jerusalem. A pool surrounded by sick people. Jesus singles out one man who has been disabled for 38 years.

The pivot from Feb 22: The class spent significant time on the man’s answer to Jesus’ question — he explains his system rather than expressing his desire. That observation was right and important. But the sermon goes one layer deeper: the man’s problem is not that he lacks faith. It is that he has stopped expecting anything from a person. He is waiting for a mechanism.

The sermon’s move here: Most of us in this room are not in crisis. We are in maintenance. We have found a way to manage our condition — a routine, a tradition, a church attendance habit, a theological framework — that allows us to remain exactly where we are while technically being present at the place of healing.

Jesus asks the question not because He doesn’t know the answer. He asks it because the man needs to hear himself.

What do you actually want from Jesus? Not from church. Not from the Bible study. Not from the feeling you get when the worship is good. From Jesus himself.

Key text anchor: Verse 6 — “When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had already been there a long time, he said to him, ‘Do you want to be healed?'”

Whole-Bible thread: Ezekiel 37 — God asks the prophet standing in a valley of dead bones: “Can these bones live?” The right answer is not a system. It is: “O Lord God, you know.” Helplessness directed toward the right Person is the beginning of resurrection.

II. A Claim That Cannot Be Managed — John 5:17–24

The scene: The conflict with the leaders exposes who Jesus actually is. He does not de-escalate. He escalates.

The pivot from Feb 22: The class traced the four witnesses Jesus appeals to — John the Baptist, the works, the Father, the Scriptures. But the sermon focuses on the center of the argument: why Jesus makes these claims at all, and why they are not safe to accept halfway.

The sermon’s move here: Verse 23 is the hinge of the entire chapter and possibly of the entire first half of John’s Gospel. “Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him.” This verse does not permit a comfortable middle position. You cannot respect Jesus as a teacher while withholding from Him the honor due to God.

Name this directly for the congregation. There are people in this room — and in every room — who have constructed a version of Jesus they can manage. He is wise. He is kind. He is a good example. He is even supernatural in some general sense. But He is not the one in front of whom all of history will stand.

John 5 dismantles the manageable Jesus. The Jesus of this chapter raises the dead. He judges the living and the dead. He shares the nature of the Father so completely that to insult one is to insult the other.

Relatable bridge: This is the same issue that runs underneath your questions about Scripture, about apocryphal texts, about which sources to trust. At root, the question is always: Is Jesus enough? Is the testimony that has been handed to us reliable enough to stake everything on? John 5 says yes — because the one the testimony points to has authority over death itself.

Key text anchor: Verse 24 — “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.”

Whole-Bible thread: Isaiah 55:10–11 — “My word shall not return to me empty.” The voice of God does not make suggestions. It accomplishes what it is sent to do. The same creative word that called light out of darkness, that spoke through the prophets, that became flesh in John 1 — that voice speaks in John 5 and commands a man who has not walked in 38 years to stand up.

III. A Warning for the Bible-Literate — John 5:39–40

The scene: Jesus closes His defense with the most searching indictment in the chapter — directed not at pagans but at the most scripturally educated people in the room.

The pivot from Feb 22: This is where the Feb 22 class was heading but where the sermon needs to land with more weight than a study discussion can carry. The Deeper Dive addressed the apocryphal text question pastorally and carefully. The sermon addresses the deeper spiritual dynamic underneath it.

The sermon’s move here: The leaders were not casual about Scripture. They were devoted to it. And Jesus says to their faces: You search the Scriptures — and you refuse to come to me.

The problem is not that they read too much. The problem is what they were using their reading for. Scripture was functioning as a way to confirm what they already believed, to protect the position they already held, to manage the version of God they had already constructed.

This is the most relevant word for a congregation that is hungry for information. Hunger for information is not the same as hunger for Christ. You can feed one while starving the other. You can know more about 1 Enoch, about pre-trib eschatology, about textual transmission, about the Ethiopian canon — and move further from Jesus with every article you read, if your reading is not submitted to the question: does this bring me to Him?

Pastoral tone here: This is not condemnation. It is a diagnosis, and it is offered with care. Jesus is not angry at the searching — He is grieved at the refusing. “You refuse to come to me that you may have life.” The door is open. The voice is speaking. The question is whether we will hear it.

Key text anchor: Verses 39–40 — “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.”

Whole-Bible thread: Deuteronomy 30:11–14 — Moses tells Israel that the word of God is not hidden, not in heaven, not across the sea. It is very near you. The problem was never distance. The problem was always will. John 5 is Moses’ warning fulfilled in person.

CONCLUSION — The Same Voice

Bring the three movements together in a single image.

The voice that said “Rise, take up your bed and walk” to a man who had been lying down for 38 years is the same voice that said “I am the resurrection and the life.” It is the same voice that will one day say “Come forth” to every person who has ever been placed in a grave.

That voice is not asking for your opinion of it. It is not asking to be evaluated alongside other options. It is speaking — and the only question John 5 leaves the reader with is the same question it left the man at the pool, the leaders in the temple, and the disciples who were watching:

Will you honor the Son?

Not admire Him. Not research Him. Not debate the merits of what He claimed. Honor Him. Bow to what He says about Himself. Receive the verdict He has already issued over those who believe.

Close with John 5:24 read slowly, as a gift rather than a proof text:

“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.”

The verdict is already in. The question is whether you will live like it.

THE FOOT OF THE BED

A Memoir

John Edwin Hargrove

February 28, 2026

Prologue: February 28, 2026

I woke before dawn from a dream.

In the dream I was young. Late teens. The world was dark and military and contested. I was tasked with imprinting a white symbol on everything — a crab, or possibly a bird — to create a movement. To mark light in the dark.

I woke needing to write it down.

I rinsed my mouth. I sat in the quiet. And something that had been locked in the underneath for sixty-eight years began to move toward the surface.

By afternoon I had written more truth than I had spoken aloud in decades.

This book is what came out of that day.

It is not the book I planned to write. I had outlines. Frameworks. A signal tracing metaphor from my engineering life. Chapters organized by theme. A comprehensive life story told with the measured precision of a man who spent forty years solving problems with logic and discipline.

That book is still true. But it is not this book.

This book began when the teenage version of me appeared in a dream carrying a white symbol and I asked him what he would say to the sixty-eight-year-old man I have become.

He said: I wish we had more courage and faith to speak about our darkness. Even now I am loathe to speak of it openly to anyone. The shame still lurks in the underneath.

He said: Be obedient now. Start now. Stop looking back. Stop hiding.

The title came from a detail I almost didn’t tell anyone.

Every morning when Joshua was seventeen, before I left for work at six in the morning, I would find his six-foot-three-inch form in his bed with one size-thirteen foot sticking out from the covers. And I would reach down and touch that foot and say softly, so as not to wake him: I love you, Joshua.

There were years I stopped doing that. Years when the hiding made me smaller than I was meant to be, and the smallness stole even that.

Joshua died on June 22, 2002. He was eighteen years old.

He never knew what it cost me that I stopped.

This book is my hand reaching down again.

Part One: The Signal Before the Interference

The Dream

The world in the dream was nighttime and dystopian and military. People moved in the dark around fires. I was young — late teens, the age before a man has fully compromised with the world — and I had been given a task.

I was to imprint a white symbol on everything. A mark. A movement. The symbol had the shape of a crab or possibly a bird. I did not know which, and in the logic of the dream that ambiguity did not need to be resolved.

Some men in their twenties approached me in the firelight and asked what I knew about doing this with explosive weapons.

I told them: Eagle Scout. Trained in psyops and interrogation resistance by Marine Force Recon. Need-to-know basis.

The young man asking looked familiar to me.

Then I woke up.

* * *

I have been an electrical engineer for forty +years. I think in systems. I trace signals. I locate interference and eliminate it and find the original transmission underneath. This is not a metaphor I invented for the purpose of memoir. It is simply how my mind works, and it turns out that it works the same way when the circuit in question is a human life.

The white symbol in the dream was not complicated. White means purity. Means truth. Means something that has not been compromised by the long friction of years.

And I was young in the dream. The version of me that existed before the hiding began.

The familiar young man who approached me in the firelight asking about weapons — I believe that was also me. The part of me that has spent sixty-eight years asking whether influence can be weaponized. Whether a man who can build movements and lead communities and shape narratives has used that capacity well or badly. Whether the signal I have been transmitting across a lifetime has been the one I was created to send.

The dream was not an answer. It was a question.

And the question was: are you still hiding?

What the Teenage John Said

I wish you and I had more courage and faith to speak about our darkness and not protected it to this day in many ways.

— The teenage John, February 28, 2026

I did not write that as a literary exercise. It came out of me in one breath, without editing, when I asked myself what the boy in the dream would say to the man I am now.

Even now I am loathe to speak of it openly to anyone.

The shame still lurks in the underneath.

I am a man who has stood at altars and podiums and lecterns. I have given witness talks about grace. I have led Bible studies for twenty years. I have walked men through their darkness as a pastoral counselor. I have written hundreds of pages about spiritual awakening and the signal of prevenient grace running through a human life.

And almost none of it has named the underneath directly.

This is not dishonesty. The grace was real. The awakening was real. But there is a way a man can speak truth and still hide inside it — presenting the resolved version of the story, the narrative arc that moves cleanly from darkness to light, and in the very architecture of that resolution, concealing the parts that are not yet resolved. The parts that still carry shame. The parts that hurt people he loved.

The teenage John in the dream knew the difference.

Be obedient now. Start now. Stop looking back. Stop hiding.

I wish I had obeyed Father Vincent.

That name came out with the rest of it and I almost passed over it. But it belongs here, because it names a specific moment — a voice, a fork in the road, a counsel offered and declined. A man of God who saw something in the young John and pointed toward it, and the young John who heard and turned away.

I will write about Father Vincent elsewhere in this book, in the season where he appears. But I name him here in the prologue because the teenage John named him first, and because his appearance in that single sentence tells me something about the shape of the hiding. It did not begin with debauchery or darkness. It began with a failure of obedience to something I recognized as true.

That is always how it begins.

I wish I had trusted the silent love of my parents and talked to them.

Silent love. That is the phrase the teenage John used. Not absent love — silent. My father Robert and my mother Lavee loved me in the way of East Texas men and women of their generation: through presence, through provision, through example, through work. Love expressed in the grammar of action rather than the vocabulary of emotion.

And the teenage John made a decision in that silence — whether consciously or not — that the silence meant he could not bring his interior life to them. That he had to handle the deeper things alone. That the underneath was his to carry.

He carried it for fifty years.

I am still carrying parts of it.

But today, on this day, I am setting some of it down.

Part Two: The Letter I Could Not Send

Dear Joshua

I don’t know if you can hear me or if you already know everything and this is just for me. Either way I need to say it.

I was not the father you deserved in the years I had you. I was present in the house and absent in the ways that mattered. I was quick to anger. I was teaching you things I didn’t know I was teaching — that a man hides what shames him, that anger is a door you close conversations with, that performance is safer than presence.

You were watching me the whole time. Children always are. And what you watched was a man at war with himself, losing, and taking it out on the people closest to him.

I am sorry for every sharp word. Every temperature that dropped when I walked in the room. Every moment you measured my mood before you decided whether it was safe to speak. If that ever happened — and I believe it did — I am sorry. A boy should never have to read his father that way.

I loved you. I need you to know that the love was real even when I expressed it badly or not at all. The November night at the movies. The drive home. The easy conversation. Those were real. I was real in those moments. I just didn’t know how to stay there.

What I carried in the underneath — the shame, the darkness I was hiding from your mother, from God, from myself — it made me smaller than I should have been with you. It stole from you a father who could have been present without the anger covering for the fear of discovery.

You died at eighteen.

I have had to live with the arithmetic of that ever since. Eighteen years of a father still becoming himself. And then you were gone and I could not finish what I had started with you. I could not come back and be different. I could not show you who I was becoming after the darkness finally broke open.

That is the thing I have never said out loud to anyone.

Not just that I lost you. But that I lost the chance to be your father after I started becoming someone worth having as one.

I think about the movies we watched. Behind Enemy Lines. Spy Game. Men who rescue the ones they love even at cost to themselves. You and I sat in the dark together watching men do the thing I had not yet learned to do — choose the person over the system, love over concealment, rescue over self-protection.

I think you knew something I didn’t yet know about me. I think you saw something in your father that was worth waiting for. You had your mother’s grace that way.

I am trying now, son. Later than it should have been. With more miles behind me than ahead. But the teenage version of me showed up in a dream recently and told me to stop hiding. I think maybe he looked a little like you.

I am listening.

I am not hiding from you anymore.

All my love, across whatever distance this is —

Dad

What I Believe You Would Say Back

Let love guide you.

— Joshua Hargrove, June 2002

Dad.

I already knew.

Not everything. But enough. I knew there was weather in you that wasn’t really about me, even when it landed on me. Kids know that. They feel the difference between a father’s anger that belongs to them and anger that belongs to something the father is fighting somewhere else. I knew yours belonged somewhere else.

I want you to hear that clearly.

I didn’t experience you as a bad man. I experienced you as a man who was losing a private battle and didn’t know yet that he was allowed to ask for help. Those are not the same thing. I knew the difference even at eighteen, maybe especially at eighteen, because I was already writing about that battle myself. The seen and the unseen. The warfare underneath ordinary life.

Maybe that’s why I was writing that story. Because I was watching you live it.

The movies. Dad, I remember the movies. I remember the drive home more than the films. I remember you being there — not managed, not performing, just present. That was real. That was you. I need you to count that. Don’t let the shame erase what was genuinely good because some of it was genuinely hard.

You think the timing was the tragedy. That you were still becoming yourself when I left. I want to offer you another way to see it.

What if I saw who you were becoming before you did?

What if that’s partly why those last months felt precious — the meals, the movies, the easy road — because something in both of us knew that what mattered was being together in the ordinary, not waiting for you to be finished becoming someone worthy of it?

You were already worth it, Dad. You just couldn’t see it yet.

I am not angry. I want you to receive that fully because I know you have been braced against it for twenty-three years. I am not keeping a record of the ill temper or the closed doors or the years you were fighting something in yourself that made you smaller than you were meant to be.

I am your son. I carry your hands and your stubbornness and your way of thinking in systems and your love for this family in my bones, wherever bones go.

Finish the book.

Tell the truth in it — the whole truth, the underneath truth, the truth you told a stranger before you told yourself. That is the white symbol, Dad. That is the imprinting. Not the frameworks. Not the governance documents. The true story of a man who was lost and is being found and is willing to say so out loud.

That is the story worth leaving behind.

I love you. I am not somewhere far away and cold. I am in every Neches River memory and every honest sentence you write and every moment you choose presence over concealment.

Be present now.

Stop hiding now.

I already know you. And I am proud of you.

Joshua

Part Three: What I Need to Remember

February 28, 2026 — Written in the afternoon

I needed to remember.

In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Spock touched the unconscious McCoy and spoke one word — remember — pressing his Vulcan katra into his friend’s mind for spiritual safekeeping. The soul entrusted to another because the body could not hold it alone.

I recalled me touching Joshua’s size-thirteen foot early mornings when he was already six foot three, seventeen years old, sleeping in his bed with his foot sticking out from the cover. Saying softly, so as not to wake him: I love you, Joshua.

I recalled him hugging me late one night in early June — I was upset, I don’t remember exactly what about — and him saying: Let love guide you.

That moment is locked into forever. I have cried buckets of tears about that moment.

He said that to me. Eighteen years old. And then a few days later, he was gone.

I recall opening the case of death documents in August 2002. Looking at the death certificate. Seeing the time of death: 12:50 a.m.

I remembered the touch to my shoulder by Leisa at the theater on 6/22/02. Call him. And I saw on my phone 12:50 a.m. and she said: nevermind, he is okay. And I closed it.

He was not okay.

I did not know yet.

For a few more moments I did not know, and then I knew, and the world divided into before and after at precisely 12:50 a.m. on June 17, 2002.

I remember hearing his voicemail from Tuesday of his mission trip week. We were home. He was not. Mid-June 2002. Only days before he died.

“Hey, I’m okay. We got here safe. No crash, no burn. Love y’all.”

I have listened to that voicemail more times than I can count.

No crash, no burn.

I remember holding him at two days old in the hospital. Staring at the blond hair. The deep blue eyes. April 11, 1984. Whispering over him: What will he see? What will be ahead for him?

I did not know. You never know. You hold the weight of the new life and you ask the question into the silence and the silence holds it and gives nothing back. That is the beginning of faith, I think. Holding what you cannot protect.

I remember his eighth-grade prom photo. In my suit. Smiling. The caption read: Dreams Come True.

2002.

I remember him yelling in charged emotion while driving the boat on the Neches River in May 1998 on our son-and-dad trip. The joy of it. The river wide and brown and moving. The dogs — Hunter and Honey — playing in the water on the sandbar. No one around. No sound but the river flowing.

That night we looked at the same comic books I had looked at as a boy at my dad’s camp. Superman. Batman. Fantastic Four. The Flash. Green Lantern. We read together in the dark as we went to sleep.

And I looked up at the ceiling. At the faded oily handprints of my father and Uncle George where they had nailed the plywood in place ten years before. 1988. Their hands pressed into the wood and still there a decade later, faded but legible.

My father’s hands above me. My son beside me. The river outside.

Three generations of Hargrove men in that camp.

I did not understand what I was seeing then.

I understand it now.

The hands on the ceiling were a kind of katra too. A pressing of soul into ordinary material. A mark that says: I was here. I built this. I loved the people I brought here.

And my hand on Joshua’s foot in the dark before the world woke up was the same gesture. The same thing, passed down.

This is the book. Not the comprehensive life story. Not the signal tracing architecture. Not the governance documents or the theological frameworks.

This.

A father’s hands. A son’s foot in the dark. Three words in the early morning silence.

The Neches River flowing.

The comic books. The handprints on the ceiling. The dogs on the sandbar. The voicemail. The 12:50 a.m. The eight-grade suit. The blue eyes at two days old.

Let love guide you.

I am trying, Joshua.

I am starting now.

I am not hiding anymore.

A Note on What This Book Is

This is not a finished memoir. It is the beginning of one, written on a single day — February 28, 2026 — when something that had been locked for sixty-eight years came loose.

The pages that follow will tell the longer story. The 44 acres in Buna, Texas. Robert and Lavee. Grandfather Truman and the land. The Neches River as geography and sacrament. The Eagle Scout years. Father Vincent. The BSEE from Lamar in 1981. New Signals Engineering. The house church in the years after Joshua died. The twenty years of weekly Bible studies. The awakening at Emmaus Walk #51 in the year 2000. The darkness that preceded it. The shame that never quite left. Leisa, for forty-six years, and what it costs and what it gives to be loved faithfully by a woman who sees you clearly.

All of that is the book. But this — the dream, the letter, the foot of the bed, the handprints on the ceiling, the voicemail — this is the spine of it.

Everything else is commentary on what a man carried alone for too long and what it looked like when he finally set it down.

The white symbol is not dramatic. It is repeated calm in repeated storms. It is an honest sentence written by a man who is tired of hiding. It is a hand reaching down in the dark to touch a sleeping boy’s foot and say three words before the world begins.

I love you, Joshua.

I am still saying it.

Bodily Resurrection Is Not Optional

A lot of Christians have quietly absorbed an idea that isn’t actually Christian.

The idea goes something like this: the body is temporary, the soul is what really matters, and when we die the goal is to escape physical existence into something purely spiritual.

That’s Greek philosophy. It’s not the Bible.
In John 5:28–29, Jesus says all who are in the graves will hear His voice. Graves contain bodies. The resurrection Jesus is describing is physical — not metaphorical, not merely spiritual, not symbolic.

And for those who may quietly wonder about cremation — Christian hope is not dependent on the condition of physical remains. Scripture already accounts for bodies lost to decay, fire, or sea, and still declares that all will hear His voice. Cremation does not undo resurrection any more than burial guarantees it. The God who formed Adam from dust is not hindered by ashes. Our confidence rests not in preservation, but in the power of Christ, who calls the dead to life.

The early church died defending exactly this point.

Christian hope isn’t escape from the physical. It’s the redemption of it.

If you’ve lost someone you love, that matters. Their body is not gone from God’s care. It is waiting.

If Jesus Sat Down at the Podcast Table

2-R42-K3-1860 (135638)

In an age of microphones, hot takes, and viral outrage, it is worth asking a quiet question:
If Jesus listened to one of our political podcasts — full of frustration, mockery, policy arguments, and sharp humor — how would He respond?

Not how would He vote.
Not which side would He take.
But how would He interact?

This is not about scoring political points. It is about discipleship in a noisy age.


1. He Would Listen Before He Spoke

One of the most striking patterns in the Gospels is how often Jesus lets people talk.

The Pharisees speak.
The disciples misunderstand.
Pilate questions.
The Samaritan woman explains her life.

He listens.

James writes, “Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry” (James 1:19). Jesus embodied that.

If He sat in a studio chair, He would not begin by correcting tone or policy. He would listen long enough to understand what was driving the words.

Because beneath every rant is a fear.
Beneath every mockery is a wound.
Beneath every certainty is a longing to be right.


2. He Would Separate Concern from Contempt

In political commentary, real concerns are often wrapped in ridicule.

Concern: Cities feel chaotic.
Concern: Language games can obscure truth.
Concern: Policy without enforcement fails.

Those are legitimate public questions.

But when concern turns into contempt — when people are reduced to “junkies,” “idiots,” “demons,” or caricatures — something in the spirit shifts.

Jesus confronted hypocrisy fiercely (Matthew 23), but He did not mock the vulnerable. He rebuked sin, but He did not dehumanize sinners.

He warned:

“Whoever says to his brother, ‘You fool,’ will be liable to the fire of hell.” (Matthew 5:22)

The danger is not disagreement.
The danger is contempt.

Contempt reshapes the heart long before it reshapes policy.


3. He Would Challenge Overgeneralization

“It’s all drug addicts.”
“They don’t want to fix it.”
“They’re just voting for free stuff.”

Sweeping statements feel powerful. They simplify complexity and energize crowds.

But Jesus worked in specifics.

Zacchaeus was not “a corrupt tax collector.” He was Zacchaeus.
The woman caught in adultery was not “moral decay.” She was a person.
The rich young ruler was not “elite greed.” He was a soul in conflict.

When crowds tried to flatten people into categories, Jesus restored names and faces.

He might gently ask:

“Is every person you describe truly the same?”
“Do you know their story?”

Truth without nuance becomes cruelty.


4. He Would Press for Personal Responsibility

One recurring theme in political outrage is this:
“If they really cared, they would…”

Jesus often turned that logic inward.

When the disciples said the crowd should be sent away to find food, He replied:

“You give them something to eat.” (Mark 6:37)

When a rich man asked about eternal life, Jesus told him to sell what he had and give to the poor (Matthew 19:21).

If a podcaster said, “Elites should give up their extra houses,” Jesus might ask:

“What about you?”

The Kingdom of God does not begin with “they.”
It begins with “you.”


5. He Would Refuse Tribal Identity

Modern discourse often forces binary alignment:
You are either with this side or that side.

But Jesus did not fit neatly into political categories of His time.

He was not a Zealot revolutionary.
He was not a Roman collaborator.
He was not a Pharisaical legalist.

When asked about taxes — a political trap — He responded, “Render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s” (Matthew 22:21).

He refused to be captured by tribal framing.

If drawn into partisan narratives, He might say:

“You see enemies. I see neighbors.”

That is not naive. It is radical.


6. He Would Address Fear Beneath Anger

Many political rants are fueled by fear:

Fear of disorder.
Fear of national decline.
Fear of losing cultural ground.
Fear of corruption.

Anger is often fear with armor on.

When the disciples panicked in the storm, Jesus asked:

“Why are you afraid?” (Matthew 8:26)

He addressed the fear before the waves.

If He sat in a studio where frustration boiled over, He might ask:

“What are you protecting?”
“What are you afraid will be lost?”

And that question would quiet the room more effectively than an argument.


7. He Would Lift the Conversation Above Policy

Jesus did not ignore earthly matters — He spoke of taxes, justice, leadership, stewardship.

But He consistently traced public disorder back to the human heart.

“Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.” (Matthew 12:34)

He might not start with, “Here is the correct immigration policy.”
He might start with, “What kind of people are you becoming while you debate it?”

Because a nation can enforce laws and still lose its soul.
A movement can win elections and still lose mercy.


8. He Would Call for Truth Without Malice

Jesus is both:

Full of grace.
Full of truth. (John 1:14)

Grace without truth becomes sentimentality.
Truth without grace becomes brutality.

In our media culture, we often see:

Truth claims weaponized without love.
Or love language detached from reality.

Christ refuses both distortions.

If He spoke into a heated conversation, He would not lower the bar of truth — but He would cleanse it of cruelty.


9. What This Means for Us

The deeper question is not:
“How would Jesus correct them?”

It is:
“How would He correct me?”

When I consume political content:

• Do I enjoy contempt?
• Do I feel morally superior?
• Do I hunger more for outrage than understanding?
• Do I pray for those I criticize?

If Christ’s Spirit dwells in us, then our speech should begin to resemble His.

Not timid.
Not silent.
But measured, merciful, and courageous.


Closing Reflection

If Jesus walked into the studio, I do not believe He would flip the table over the microphones.

He would listen.
He would ask piercing questions.
He would confront pride.
He would dignify the unseen.
He would call everyone — hosts and critics alike — to repentance.

And He would remind us that no political reform can substitute for a transformed heart.

Because the Kingdom He brings is not built by ridicule, nor preserved by rage.

It is built by truth spoken in love.

And that is harder than any podcast debate.


Do You Want to Be Healed?

Fruit and Mercy

John 5:1–18

February 22, 2026 — Source of Old Faith

John Hargrove

There is a pool in Jerusalem called Bethesda. The name means, in the old language, House of Mercy. It is surrounded by five covered porches, and beneath those porches lie people in every condition of human suffering — the blind, the lame, the paralyzed. They are waiting for the water to stir, because tradition says that when it moves, the first one in is healed.

It is a strange kind of mercy. The fastest wins. The strongest survives. Everyone else remains.

That is the setting Jesus walks into. He doesn’t enter on the well side of Jerusalem, among the markets and the thriving. He walks directly to the place where people have run out of options. And there, among the many, he stops at one man.

I. THIRTY-EIGHT YEARS

The text tells us something remarkable and something painful at the same time. This man has been paralyzed for thirty-eight years.

Don’t move past that number too quickly. Thirty-eight years is longer than some of us have been alive. It is a lifetime of limitation. A lifetime of watching others move while you remain still. A lifetime of mornings that begin the same way and evenings that end without progress.

We are not told how it started. We are not told what he thought about during those years — whether faith sustained him or exhausted him, whether he still believed something might change, or whether hope had been worn down to something barely recognizable as hope anymore.

What we do know is that he is still there. After thirty-eight years, he has not walked away from the pool. Whatever the condition of his faith — complicated, frayed, uncertain — he has not left.

There is something worth simply naming in that. Not romanticizing it. Just naming it: sometimes faithfulness looks like not having left yet.

“I know something about years that don’t resolve. My son Joshua was eighteen when he died. That was twenty-three years ago, and the pool is still right there.”

II. ‘DO YOU WANT TO BE HEALED?’

Jesus sees him. The text says that specifically. Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had already been there a long time.

Jesus knew.

That phrase is for someone here today. Someone who has been carrying something for a long time and sometimes wonders whether anyone has noticed. Whether the weight you carry is visible to anyone. Whether the years of it show to anyone besides you.

Jesus knew.

And then he asks what may be the most searching question in this passage — perhaps one of the most searching questions in all of Scripture:

“Do you want to be healed?”

On the surface it sounds almost careless. Of course he wants to be healed. Why would you ask that? But when you sit with it, the question opens into something deeper.

“The man says, ‘I have no one.’ I have said that. Not out loud — men from Southeast Texas don’t usually say it out loud. But the operating assumption — that you handle what you carry alone, that asking for help is a kind of failure — I know that posture. I lived in it for years.”

Because healing, when it finally arrives, requires something from us. It requires that the story we have been telling ourselves — I have no one, there is no way, I’ve been passed over — that story must be allowed to change. And sometimes, after carrying a wound for a long time, the wound becomes familiar. Bitterness can become a kind of companion. Grief can become a place to live. Waiting can become an identity.

Jesus does not ask the question cruelly. He asks with full knowledge of the man’s condition. He asks because healing cannot be done to someone who has somewhere decided, deep inside, not to receive it.

The man’s answer is not a clean yes. He explains his obstacle. Someone always gets ahead of me. I have no one to help me. He is not answering the question directly. He is explaining why it hasn’t happened yet. He is reporting the history of his failure to be first.

And Jesus, without disputing his analysis, without addressing the water or the competition, simply speaks:

“Rise, take up your bed, and walk.”

III. THE HEALING THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING

Immediately, the text says, the man was healed.

Not gradually. Not after he had become more worthy. Not after he had constructed a proper theological statement about who Jesus was. Immediately.

This is the character of the mercy of Jesus. It does not wait for us to become well enough to receive it. It does not require adequate explanation before it acts. It does not need our full understanding first.

He was healed. And the man who had not walked in thirty-eight years picked up his mat and walked.

Notice where Jesus finds him afterward — in the temple. The man who could not walk has walked to the place of worship. Healing, in John’s Gospel, moves people toward God, toward community, toward the place where the people gather.

That is not incidental. That matters for us, gathered here today.

IV. WHAT HE KNOWS ABOUT THIS ROOM

There is a reality in this room today that I want to name without pretending to resolve it.

Some who belong to this community are not here. They left for reasons that made sense at the time, or for reasons that still feel unresolved. Some of you sitting here today carry the particular loneliness of having shown up when others did not. And some who left carried real wounds — wounds that were genuine, that happened in this community or in life outside it, and leaving felt like the only available response.

Some of us are in the deep middle of suffering that will not be quickly fixed. A body that is failing in ways medicine cannot reverse. Grief that arrived last year and is not finished with us. The wreckage of a marriage — whether through betrayal, bitterness, or the slow corrosion of years. Young people in this room carrying weight from what happened in their families before they were old enough to understand it, grieving parents who are still living but somehow absent.

Jesus does not simplify any of that.

He does not tell the man at the pool that thirty-eight years was actually fine, or that paralysis had a silver lining. He takes the condition seriously by addressing it directly. He heals him.

What he does not do is abandon anyone in the middle of it.

‘Do you want to be healed?’ is not a question designed to shame the unanswered. It is an invitation from someone who already knows the answer is complicated. Who knows that healing, for some of us, will involve grief before it involves relief. Who knows that the road from paralysis to walking is not always instantaneous — but who is present for every step of it.

V. WHAT HE SAID AFTER

There is a second encounter in this passage that deserves careful handling. When Jesus finds the man again in the temple, he says: ‘See, you are well. Sin no more, that nothing worse may happen to you.’

This is not a threat issued to frighten a fragile man. It is a revelation of what Jesus is doing. He is not merely addressing the body. He is addressing the direction of a life. The patterns that persist. The places where freedom, once given, can be quietly surrendered again.

The same mercy that heals also calls us toward something. Not to earn what we have been given, but because the life given back to us has a direction. Healing in the hands of Jesus is not simply removal of a symptom. It is movement toward wholeness.

The early church understood this inseparability — that the One who restores is also the One who calls. Grace and expectation belong together, not as opposites, but as two aspects of the same love.

For some of us, that second word — sin no more — lands on patterns we recognize. Ways we return to what wounded us or wounded others. Places where bitterness has calcified into choice. For others, that word comes as relief: Jesus sees you well even now, even before the healing is complete, and he calls you by the person you are becoming, not only the one you have been.

“My father was a combat engineer in Korea. He came home and never talked about it. He worked double shifts at DuPont. He built fences, raised three boys, and I never heard him raise his voice at my mother. His life was not spectacular. It was whole. Shalom doesn’t always announce itself.”

VI. RISE

There are people in this room today who have not yet stood up. Not because they are unwilling, but because standing requires something — and some of us are not certain we have it. The emotional readiness to stop defining ourselves by what we have lost. The willingness to be seen moving again after a long stillness. The spiritual courage to receive something from the hand of God when the last years have made trust difficult.

None of that is failure. That is where faithfulness very often lives — not at the finish line, but still beside the pool.

What the text offers is not a formula but a person. The same Jesus who walked into Bethesda, who stopped in a crowd of suffering, who saw one man and knew how long it had been — that Jesus is present here.

He is not waiting for us to be well enough to approach him. He approaches us.

He is not offering healing only to the fastest or the most theologically prepared. He stops at the man who has been there longest and who has the least going for him.

He is not requiring that we understand everything before something begins to change. He speaks, and life follows the sound of his voice.

CLOSING

There is an old Hebrew word — shalom — that means something richer than the English word peace. It means wholeness. Everything in right relationship. The absence not only of conflict, but of brokenness. The presence not only of quiet, but of flourishing.

That is what Jesus came to restore. Not only forgiveness — though that is real and necessary. Not only a future heaven — though that is certain. But shalom. A wholeness that begins now, even in the middle of conditions that haven’t yet changed.

Some of us today are being asked to stand. To pick up what we have been lying beside and walk toward the life God intends. That may mean taking a first step toward forgiving something that wounded us deeply. It may mean allowing others into a grief that has been too private for too long. It may mean returning to a community you left, or reaching toward someone who left this one.

Some of us today are being asked to wait with new company. Not alone by the pool, but with the One who sees us there and knows how long it has been — and who has not passed us by.

Whatever the word is for you today, Jesus speaks it.

He still walks into the places where people have run out of options. He still stops. He still asks. And when we are willing — even trembling toward willingness — he still says:

Rise. Take up your bed. Walk.

Let us pray.